[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

george w. kennie geobet at gis.net
Wed Apr 30 09:39:59 AKDT 2008


I'm not sure I qualify?



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal


> If Georgie and I get Old Fart Points, you youngsters are in trouble.
> 
> Ron VP
> 
> On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Jay Marshall wrote:
> 
>> What about Old Fart points? Are you kiddies worried?
>>
>>
>> Jay Marshall
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca- 
>> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of JShulman
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:22 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>>
>>
>> Wow, you mean I still get kiddie points.... best news all day...lol
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jason
>> www.jasonshulman.com
>> www.shulmanaviation.com
>> www.composite-arf.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca- 
>> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:14 PM
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>>
>> Ohhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>
>> Do you mean we should stop giving Jason and Andrew kiddie points????
>>
>>
>> MattK
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 9:13 am
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>>
>> You were kidding?   I wasn't kidding about getting special  
>> scoring    bonuses for age and (lack of) height.  Or was I?    Ron  
>> VP    On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:01 AM, John Konneker wrote:    > Matt,   
>> > You know I'm just kidding right?  > :-)  > JLK  >  >  > From:  
>> mjfrederick at cox.net  > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  >  
>> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:40:55 -0500  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA- 
>> discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > I don't see the necessity  
>> for such a proposal... All the people you    > are competing with  
>> in your region (hence breaking the NSRCA up into    > districts)  
>> are dealing with the same problem. It would be a net    >  zero  
>> change in the results, just allowing you to feel better about    >  
>> yourself because you got better scores... to quote the  
>> Godfather...    > "After all, we are not communists..." While we're  
>> at it let's just    > change the name of the sport to Soccer...  >   
>> > Matt  >  > Yeah, I know I'm gonna ruffle some feathers with the  
>> soccer    > remark... get over it...  > ----- Original Message  
>> -----  > From: John Konneker  > To: General pattern discussion  >  
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:34 PM  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA- 
>> discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > Anthony,  > Please don't  
>> think of it as a "handicap".  > Think of it as a well...let's call  
>> it what it is.  > A "Correction Factor".  > I can see this process  
>> causing a lot of changes.  > How 'bout the monthly magazine's name  
>> becomming "The NSRCA    > Correction Factor"?!?  > This is only the  
>> tip of the iceberg (get it...iceberg...lol)  > JLK  >  >  > ; Date:  
>> Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:19:51 -0700  > From: aabdu at sbcglobal.net  > To:  
>> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]  
>> Rules change proposal  >  > John,  > You are a fricking genius. As  
>> a snow belt sufferer living less than    > 90 miles from Buffalo  
>> New York, I could use the "handicap" to    > adjust for our nearly  
>> 8 month long winter and subsequent RC    > inactivity.  >  > Tim  
>> Wortkoetter <twortkoetter at yahoo.com> wrote:  > I think it should  
>> also apply to people who have two kids under the    > age of 3.  >   
>> > Tim Wortkoetter  >  > ----- Original Message ----  > From: John  
>> Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com>  > To: Discussion List <nsrca- 
>> discussion at lists.nsrc a.org>  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008  
>> 3:56:43 PM  > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >   
>> > I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and  
>> sportsmanship    > in the NSRCA since returning to pattern.  > I  
>> feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that I     
>> > think now could be corrected.  > I just got in from flying my  
>> Focus II for the first time since last    > October.  > It (I) was  
>> terrible!  The long winter layoffs here in the northern    > climes  
>> imposes a real hardship on pattern pilots living here.  > To be  
>> fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k-   >  
>> factors based on the annual mean temperature and  > extreme lows (I  
>> want to leave out highs) of where one lives.  > For example my  
>> lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff    > and then  
>> go up from there according to degree of difficulty of  > maneuver.   
>> In some cases I can see 20+ easily.  >  Folks like Derek, Ron  
>> Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in    > California would have  
>> highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe    > even fractional or  
>> minus.  These k-factors would be assigned by    > pilot and voted  
>> on only by members that have at least 24" of snow    > each year.   
>> > What do you all think?  > I want to be fair.  > JLK  >  > Be a  
>> better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.    >  
>> Try it now._______________________________________________  > NSRCA- 
>> discussion mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  >  
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >  
>> _______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion  
>> mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > http:// 
>> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >  
>> _______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion  
>> mailing list  > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  > http:// 
>> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion     
>> _______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion  
>> mailing list  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org  http:// 
>> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com: America's #1 Mapping Site.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>

-- 
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 6625 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Get the free SPAMfighter here: http://www.spamfighter.com/len




More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list