[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Wed Apr 30 09:06:40 AKDT 2008
If Georgie and I get Old Fart Points, you youngsters are in trouble.
Ron VP
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Jay Marshall wrote:
> What about Old Fart points? Are you kiddies worried?
>
>
> Jay Marshall
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of JShulman
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:22 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>
>
> Wow, you mean I still get kiddie points.... best news all day...lol
>
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of rcmaster199 at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>
> Ohhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
> Do you mean we should stop giving Jason and Andrew kiddie points????
>
>
> MattK
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 9:13 am
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>
> You were kidding? I wasn't kidding about getting special
> scoring bonuses for age and (lack of) height. Or was I? Ron
> VP On Apr 30, 2008, at 6:01 AM, John Konneker wrote: > Matt,
> > You know I'm just kidding right? > :-) > JLK > > > From:
> mjfrederick at cox.net > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:40:55 -0500 > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-
> discussion] Rules change proposal > > I don't see the necessity
> for such a proposal... All the people you > are competing with
> in your region (hence breaking the NSRCA up into > districts)
> are dealing with the same problem. It would be a net > zero
> change in the results, just allowing you to feel better about >
> yourself because you got better scores... to quote the
> Godfather... > "After all, we are not communists..." While we're
> at it let's just > change the name of the sport to Soccer... >
> > Matt > > Yeah, I know I'm gonna ruffle some feathers with the
> soccer > remark... get over it... > ----- Original Message
> ----- > From: John Konneker > To: General pattern discussion >
> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:34 PM > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-
> discussion] Rules change proposal > > Anthony, > Please don't
> think of it as a "handicap". > Think of it as a well...let's call
> it what it is. > A "Correction Factor". > I can see this process
> causing a lot of changes. > How 'bout the monthly magazine's name
> becomming "The NSRCA > Correction Factor"?!? > This is only the
> tip of the iceberg (get it...iceberg...lol) > JLK > > > ; Date:
> Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:19:51 -0700 > From: aabdu at sbcglobal.net > To:
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
> Rules change proposal > > John, > You are a fricking genius. As
> a snow belt sufferer living less than > 90 miles from Buffalo
> New York, I could use the "handicap" to > adjust for our nearly
> 8 month long winter and subsequent RC > inactivity. > > Tim
> Wortkoetter <twortkoetter at yahoo.com> wrote: > I think it should
> also apply to people who have two kids under the > age of 3. >
> > Tim Wortkoetter > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: John
> Konneker <jlkonn at hotmail.com> > To: Discussion List <nsrca-
> discussion at lists.nsrc a.org> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008
> 3:56:43 PM > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal >
> > I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and
> sportsmanship > in the NSRCA since returning to pattern. > I
> feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that I
> > think now could be corrected. > I just got in from flying my
> Focus II for the first time since last > October. > It (I) was
> terrible! The long winter layoffs here in the northern > climes
> imposes a real hardship on pattern pilots living here. > To be
> fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k- >
> factors based on the annual mean temperature and > extreme lows (I
> want to leave out highs) of where one lives. > For example my
> lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff > and then
> go up from there according to degree of difficulty of > maneuver.
> In some cases I can see 20+ easily. > Folks like Derek, Ron
> Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in > California would have
> highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe > even fractional or
> minus. These k-factors would be assigned by > pilot and voted
> on only by members that have at least 24" of snow > each year.
> > What do you all think? > I want to be fair. > JLK > > Be a
> better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. >
> Try it now._______________________________________________ > NSRCA-
> discussion mailing list > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org >
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion > >
> _______________________________________________ > NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > http://
> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion > >
> _______________________________________________ > NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > http://
> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion
> mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://
> lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com: America's #1 Mapping Site.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list