[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

[J N Hiller]

Being a fair weather flier living in snow country with multiple physical and
questionable mental disorders I certainly could use some help. Sounds like a
refined handicap system could result in everyone getting 1000 normalized
points leaving only judging discrepancies to separate contestants.
Interesting. If we just use performance projection based on historical
averages we could just award the placement trophies without having to judge.
Is it Bud time yet.
Jim Hiller

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of
rcmaster199 at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 9:14 AM
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

Ohhhhh!!!!!!!!!!

Do you mean we should stop giving Jason and Andrew kiddie points????

MattK


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 9:13 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal



You were kidding?   I wasn't kidding about getting special scoring
bonuses for age and (lack of) height.  Or was I?    Ron VP    On Apr 30,
2008, at 6:01 AM, John Konneker wrote:    > Matt,  > You know I'm just
kidding right?  > :-)  > JLK  >  >  > From:  mjfrederick at cox.net
<mailto:mjfrederick at cox.net>   > To:  nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>   > Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008
01:40:55 -0500  > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >
> I don't see the necessity for such a proposal... All the people you    >
are competing with in your region (hence breaking the NSRCA up into    >
districts) are dealing with the same problem. It would be a net    >
 zero change in the results, just allowing you to feel better about    >
yourself because you got better scores... to quote the Godfather...    >
"After all, we are not communists..." While we're at it let's just    >
change the name of the sport to Soccer...  >  > Matt  >  > Yeah, I know I'm
gonna ruffle some feathers with the soccer    > remark... get over it...
 > ----- Original Message -----  > From: John Konneker  > To: General
pattern discussion  > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:34 PM  > Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > Anthony,  > Please don't
think of it as a "handicap".  > Think of it as a well...let's call it what
it is.  > A "Correction Factor".  > I can see this process causing a lot of
changes.  > How 'bout the monthly magazine's name becomming "The NSRCA    >
Correction Factor"?!?  > This is only the tip of the iceberg (get
it...iceberg...lol)  > JLK  >  >  >
 ; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:19:51 -0700  > From:  aabdu at sbcglobal.net
<mailto:aabdu at sbcglobal.net>   > To:  nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>   > Subject: Re:
[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >  > John,  > You are a fricking
genius. As a snow belt sufferer living less than    > 90 miles from Buffalo
New York, I could use the "handicap" to    > adjust for our nearly 8 month
long winter and subsequent RC    > inactivity.  >  > Tim Wortkoetter <
twortkoetter at yahoo.com <mailto:twortkoetter at yahoo.com> > wrote:  > I think
it should also apply to people who have two kids under the    > age of 3.  >
> Tim Wortkoetter  >  > ----- Original Message ----  > From: John Konneker <
jlkonn at hotmail.com <mailto:jlkonn at hotmail.com> >  > To: Discussion List <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrc <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
 a.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >  > Sent: Tuesday, April
29, 2008 3:56:43 PM  > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal  >
> I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship    > in
the NSRCA since returning to pattern.  > I feel though that there has been
an oversight in the rules that I    > think now could be corrected.  > I
just got in from flying my Focus II for the first time since last    >
October.  > It (I) was terrible!  The long winter layoffs here in the
northern    > climes imposes a real hardship on pattern pilots living here.
> To be fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k-   >
factors based on the annual mean temperature and  > extreme lows (I want to
leave out highs) of where one lives.  > For example my lowest k-factor would
be 10 for landing and takeoff    > and then go up from there according to
degree of difficulty of  > maneuver.  In some cases I can see 20+ easily.  >
  Folks like Derek, Ron Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in    > California
would have highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe    > even fractional
or minus.  These k-factors would be assigned by    > pilot and voted on only
by members that have at least 24" of snow    > each year.  > What do you all
think?  > I want to be fair.  > JLK  >  > Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.    > Try it
now._______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion
mailing list  >  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>   >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >
_______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  >  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>   >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  >  >
_______________________________________________  > NSRCA-discussion mailing
list  >  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>   >
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________  NSRCA-discussion mailing
list   NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  _____

Plan your next roadtrip with MapQuest.com
<http://www.mapquest.com/?ncid=mpqmap00030000000004> : America's #1 Mapping
Site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080430/a50e03a2/attachment-0001.html