[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
ORLANDO FRETS
ojfrets at earthlink.net
Tue Apr 29 15:08:21 AKDT 2008
I love the idea.
Orlando
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of John Konneker
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 6:03 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
Ron,
I'm sorry.
I left out that my proposal would exempt you from any adverse effects of the
"Correction Factor".
You did such a great job on the Nats banquet last year I was trying to stay
on your
good side. I have to admit I was hoping by doing so I would get a better
table than
the one you assigned me to out in the lobby!
JLK
> From: vanputte at cox.net
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:42:34 -0500
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal
>
> I totally agree. However, there should be similar adjustments for
> those who live/fly where it gets very hot. There should also be age
> and pilot height adjustments for those who can't see as well, either
> because their eyes are weaker, or the fact that shorter pilots must
> look up further to see their airplanes. I just want to be fair too.
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> On Apr 29, 2008, at 3:56 PM, John Konneker wrote:
>
> > I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship
> > in the NSRCA since returning to pattern.
> > I feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that I
> > think now could be corrected.
> > I just got in from flying my Focus II for the first time since last
> > October.
> > It (I) was terrible! The long winter layoffs here in the northern
> > climes imposes a real hardship on pattern pilots living here.
> > To be fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k-
> > factors based on the annual mean temperature and
> > extreme lows (I want to leave out highs) of where one lives.
> > For example my lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff
> > and then go up from there according to degree of difficulty of
> > maneuver. In some cases I can see 20+ easily.
> > Folks like Derek, Ron Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in
> > California would have highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe
> > even fractional or minus. These k-factors would be assigned by
> > pilot and voted on only by members that have at least 24" of snow
> > each year.
> > What do you all think?
> > I want to be fair.
> > JLK
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080429/dbd7b7ec/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list