[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal

John Konneker jlkonn at hotmail.com
Tue Apr 29 14:03:02 AKDT 2008


Ron,
I'm sorry.
I left out that my proposal would exempt you from any adverse effects of the 
"Correction Factor".
You did such a great job on the Nats banquet last year I was trying to stay on your
good side.  I have to admit I was hoping by doing so I would get a better table than
the one you assigned me to out in the lobby!
JLK> From: vanputte at cox.net> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:42:34 -0500> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposal> > I totally agree. However, there should be similar adjustments for > those who live/fly where it gets very hot. There should also be age > and pilot height adjustments for those who can't see as well, either > because their eyes are weaker, or the fact that shorter pilots must > look up further to see their airplanes. I just want to be fair too.> > Ron Van Putte> > On Apr 29, 2008, at 3:56 PM, John Konneker wrote:> > > I have been impressed by the spirit of fair play and sportsmanship > > in the NSRCA since returning to pattern.> > I feel though that there has been an oversight in the rules that I > > think now could be corrected.> > I just got in from flying my Focus II for the first time since last > > October.> > It (I) was terrible! The long winter layoffs here in the northern > > climes imposes a real hardship on pattern pilots living here.> > To be fair I would like to propose an adjustment to the maneuver k- > > factors based on the annual mean temperature and> > extreme lows (I want to leave out highs) of where one lives.> > For example my lowest k-factor would be 10 for landing and takeoff > > and then go up from there according to degree of difficulty of> > maneuver. In some cases I can see 20+ easily.> > Folks like Derek, Ron Davies, Chris Fitzsimmons living in > > California would have highest k-factors of 1...who knows...maybe > > even fractional or minus. These k-factors would be assigned by > > pilot and voted on only by members that have at least 24" of snow > > each year.> > What do you all think?> > I want to be fair.> > JLK> > _______________________________________________> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion> > _______________________________________________> NSRCA-discussion mailing list> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080429/f916a282/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list