[NSRCA-discussion] Joy of Trim
Matthew Frederick
mjfrederick at cox.net
Fri Apr 11 14:24:19 AKDT 2008
Vince, you would be amazed at what having a well-trimmed airplane can compensate for... Even my flying looks decent with Bryan's airplanes... The coolest thing I noticed was when I was flying his composite Shinden (production model)... I was doing a 4-point roll and dumb-thumbed the backside rudder... as ugly as it looked I was still able to recover and didn't lose much from the original line. A well trimmed airplane will fly a good line no matter what attitude it's in, and simply giving a little wrong rudder for a split second won't kill a maneuver (or the one that follows for that matter).
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: vicenterc at comcast.net
To: chad at f3acanada.org ; NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Joy of Trim
I believe that the Abbra has the same problem. As I said before, my electric version had similar negative TL. I adjusted to be close to zero. I flew fist time last weekend. That was my first fly this year. I really have so many trim problems in my fingers and brain that I can not give good results in trimming the plane. Also, it was very windy but it is clear that the results are similar to your results. I will try to fly this weekend if weather cooperates. I will report more details as soon as I have chance.
Right now I am here: wings +0.8, stab -0.5, TL -0.5. I will try to get the TL closer to 0 before flying this weekend.
--
Vicente "Vince" Bortone
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Chad Northeast <chadnortheast at shaw.ca>
> Guys
>
> A while back I posted this, and have recently got around to the suggestions.
> Both Bryan and Nat said that the TL was far too much negative as the Twister has
> -2.5 deg molded into the fuse. So away I went, here is a copy of the email
> (just below) I sent to them after my flights to resolve it.
>
> Before last week you could have never convinced me that you could get a plane
> neutral in knife edge without giving up something....well I officially stand
> corrected :-) They know their stuff, were right on the money and the Twister
> goes pretty much anywhere you point it now without mixing (except a bit on
> downline but I think I can get rid of that).
>
> I gotta say thanks ! to Brya n and Nat for their help, they were bang on, and I
> would suggest to anyone that you give their suggestions and honest try, I bet
> you are more than happy with the results!
>
> Chad
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Well finally got out flying, good thing too since I am off to NY state
> again on Monday :-(
>
> So, here is where I was, I broke down and bought an inclinometer so I
> could actually measure the plane directly....since I am too lazy to do
> trig.
>
> Engine, as molded is -2.5 but I was at -3.5, wing +0.8, stab +0.1.
>
> So I got as much of the down out of it as possible which leaves me at -1,
> I can't do any more without shimming the motor further out for more
> clearance spinner to nose ring. I put the wing back to +0.5 and left the
> stab alone.
>
> First flight today, removed the left rudder KE mix I had (had none on > r ight rudder), and downline mix.
> - Plane needed a bit of down trim for level, but was pretty close
> - Uplines went to the canopy
> - 45 ups inverted pulled over the top fairly hard
> - 45 downs upright were pretty decent but still dove a bit - recall this
> was my major beef with previous setup
> - knife was pulling to canopy both ways
>
> Second flight - moved CG back as I have felt that it was too far forward
> in general, and I think you would agree if you saw where it was.
> - more down trim
> - Uplines became very close
> - knife both ways was pretty good, really solid with right rudder, and
> very very close on left (slight belly pitch)...probably not worth mixing
> out
> - 45 downs upright were getting better
> - downline mix reduced 2% from start
> - 45 ups inverted better
>
> Third flight - took out 1/2 turn of incidence, which by tr! ig shou ld put me
> at 0.41+ on the wings
> - uplines became perfect, or really close...would need more flights in
> various conditions to nail
> - everything else was really close
>
> Fourth flight - decided to adjust stab since I was carrying a little up
> elevator, so I took 1/2 turn out of adjuster which should being it close
> to 0
> - this pretty much sealed it
> - uplines are as before, very very close
> - no KE mix - even in the KE loop at high deflections its really, really
> good
> - took another 1% out of my downline mix (I am at 2%, started at 5%)
> - 45 ups inverted are really good, just a slight arc over the top
> - 45 down upright is finally straight.
>
> I need to spend some more time on it to really get a good feel, but I
> think the downthrust was causing a lot of problems to this plane. I have
> never had it in all aspects of flight ! this cl ose yet. I am anxious to get
> more time on it and see if the changes really stick. Unfortunately on
> Sunday this plane is going to a buddy but I plan on incorporating all
> these changes on the new Twister which is why I wanted to get it figured
> out now :)
>
> Any further comments? CG is probably around 33% of MAC, but to be exact I
> would have to calculate.
>
> Upline snaps are as you say Bryan, on axis with no need to lead....I was
> pretty happy to see that result :)
>
> Chad
>
>
> > > > From: "Chad Northeast"
> > > > To: "NSRCA Mailing List"
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 4:57 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] the joy of trim
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Ok you trim masters, here is a tric! ky one for you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bryan and I have been through this a bit last year but I
> > ran out of
> > > time
> > > > > before the Worlds to fix it and just flew with what I had.
> > > > >
> > > > > On my Twister I have this pesky problem, the setup is like so,
> > > > >
> > > > > wing = 1/2+ Bryans suggestion and I like it
> > > > > stab = 0
> > > > > motor = factory claims 2.5 down, have not measured but
> > could if asked,
> > > I
> > > > > have added more to cure a problem see below
> > > > > CG = has been anywhere from 275 to 300mm from TE mostly
> > with the same
> > > > > result. Currently its around 285-290 and it feels
> > good at that point.
> > > 45
> &g! t; > > > ups inverted track almost hands off if under enough power.
> > > > >
> > > > > Symptoms,
> > > > >
> > > > > Plane flies well, at this setup I need 0 mix right rudder
> > to ele in
> > > knife,
> > > > > and about 2% up ele with left rudder in knife,
> > > > > about 1/32" down elevator with idle to fix a downline
> > > > > Added downthrust as the increase in wing inc. and more
> > forward CG
> > > really
> > > > > helped the mix in knife and made rollers easier, but
> > forced an
> > > increase in
> > > > > downthrust as the plane started pulling to the canopy on
> > uplines.> > > Downline mix remained the same.
> > > > >
> > > > > The big problem I cannot resolve is this,! a 45 d eg down
> > upright (motor
> > > at
> > > > > idle) the plane pitches to the belly and will not track on
> > its own for
> > > any
> > > > > length of time. If I switch the idle-down mix off
> > its rock solid on
> > > that
> > > > > line.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am open to all suggestions now that I have a bit of time
> > to play
> > > with
> > > > > this, I hope Bryan chimes in some more as I would like to
> > continue> where
> > > > > we left off last fall. If you suggest something I
> > will do my best to
> > > give
> > > > > it a go and let you know how it works (provided it doesn't
> > snow!)> > >
> > > > > The plane is basically super locked in with this set! up,
> > except for the
> > > > > silly 45 down upright, which is a problem in cubans and such.
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments and thoughts from the masters are most
> > appreciated :) I
> > > consider
> > > > > myself one of the, cant really trim that well but can fly
> > through it
> > > just
> > > > > fine types :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Chad
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > > >
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.! nsrca.o rg
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20080411/ef4fd7a5/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list