[NSRCA-discussion] Airplane Weight Limits

Claude Weimer cweimer at tconl.com
Mon Jun 25 15:02:43 AKDT 2007


Good one Dan. 

 

  _____  

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 5:15 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Airplane Weight Limits

 

 

 

"After reading all the responses on this issue, John Fuqua has decided to
amend his draft rule change proposal to require that electric-powered
airplanes be weighed with battery, but be given 4 oz relief from the 5 KG
(11 lb) maximum weight .  His logic is that, even the Intermediate/Advanced
glow-powered airplanes use about 10 oz of fuel in a flight and 10 oz of fuel
weighs about 8 oz.  So, halfway through the flight, a glow-powered airplane
in the Intermediate/Advanced class, which barely makes the weight limit, is
likely to weigh about 11 lb 4 oz.   The guys in the Master class would still
be at a disadvantage, but a 4 oz relief is still better than a stick in the
eye." 

 

Ron Van Putte

 

 

I have really wanted to stay out of this thread but after reading the above
posting, I could no longer bite my tongue. There is "no" logic in the so
called amended draft rule change.  This would be a major rule change, that
by concensus, would have a very good chance of having a huge negative impact
on or sport and this so called logic is based on conjecture and on entry
level planes that might be on the heavy side.  Fly electric, fly glow, fly
rubber power but leave the weight and size rules alone.  The balance in the
cost and the performance of the planes in our sport is very good but it
could very easily be lost and to do so unnecessarily would be a tragic
mistake.  Electric is viiable now and we are told it will get even more so
as time passes, fine.  If those among us want to do the work and spend the
dollars to use electrics (when other options are available) then so be it.
They can meet the rules now so there is no valid reason for change at this
time.  I wanted to go electric in the worst way, awhile back, I did the math
and it was very apparant, with the amount of flying that I do, that electric
flight was way of of my league.  As the prices come down (not enough) I will
continue to evaluate them.  However if the cost was not a factor I am sure I
could meet the requirements of the rules just as many others have done to
date, and it would would never enter my mind ask for a rule change to be
passed if I couldn't do it or just to make it easier for one power source to
be used.  

 

Dan Curtis   

 

Dan Curtis

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070625/e21ea1ea/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list