[NSRCA-discussion] Back to glow???!!!

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Chad 
 
same can be said for wet set ups, except the cost associated with the RD seems quite a bit less. We all have burned pistons, rings and liners before getting the large engines to behave themselves. Not to mention all the bearings folks killed because of lean set-ups at mid-throttle. And some guys never were able to get the large beasties to behave consistently. 
 
MattK
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: chad at f3acanada.org
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Sent: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Back to glow???!!!


Hi Terry

I would be very surprised to see that happen.  Electrics will never 
replace glow (and vice versa), but those who fly electrics and like 
their setups will likely take a lot of convincing to switch back.  For 
me it would take a "no electrics" rules change to force me back to 
glow....and I would go back kicking and screaming!

E-power can be a huge money sucking R&D pit, especially if you deviate 
just slightly from a common proven setup....that leaves a bad taste in 
peoples mouths, and certainly feeds  a lot of the negativity toward 
e-power, and rightfully so.

Chad
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070115/e78a46be/attachment.html