[NSRCA-discussion] SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?

[DaveL322 at comcast.net]

I'd second that.

Flying a fast pace (different than simply flying fast) leaves less time to make accurate corrections in and between maneuvers - just about all of us can benefit from more time to "see" and adjust maneuvers resulting in better maneuvers.  Fast paced maneuvers done accurately should score the same but are much harder to do.

Dave

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Fred Huber" <fhhuber at clearwire.net> 

flying slower  gives more TIME and helps make the plane fly smoother (within reason...)  Firewalling the throttle and leaving it there will keep you rushed... especially if you are flying too close.


From: Tommy Scarmardo 
To: NSRCA Mailing List 
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?


Gray,
You could not be more correct . A number of times I've been told by a judge I would have
scored better if I'd have flown slower.

tommy s

Gray E Fowler <gfowler at raytheon.com> wrote:

"OK... make noticeable speed variations doing your maneuvers in your 
sequence.... watch your score.

If you vary your speed... you're gonna get downgrades.  Prove it wrong by 
varying speed but doing the maneuver the correct shape and getting a 10.  It 
will not happen." 


Fred you probably are correct, your scores will suffer. Daves point is (and my installing exclaimations points) that this is not in the rules and any of you that are judging per this criteria are wrong and are damaging our beloved hobby.  Be fair people and follow the rules, not your bias, as you will never know what the other judge's bias could possibly be...and I have heard many idiotic based judging bias. 
By the way I conducted a study, employed  IPDS and produced a matrix that proves that such judging bias is the reason why the number of pattern flyers has steadily decreased over the last 20 years. If you wanna increase our numbers eliminate judges who do not follow the rules, it will be approximately 74.571% more effective than creating a "new rule" eliminating 2M planes from lower classes. 

Signed, with love 

Terminal Advanced Guy........until I can get rid of my kids...

Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/619 - Release Date: 1/7/2007
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070108/0b340255/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "Fred Huber" <fhhuber at clearwire.net>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion]
	SmallModels...goodforthefutureofthePatternEvent?
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:40:54 +0000
Size: 739
Url: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070108/0b340255/attachment.mht