[NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR
Tony Stillman
tony at radiosouthrc.com
Fri Feb 23 11:17:36 AKST 2007
Corky:
You might be interested in the XPS system. I saw it work at the Ontario
show and they have versions for virtually all systems, as they plug into the
trainer port of the TX..
Tony Stillman, President
Radio South
3702 N. Pace Blvd
Pensacola, FL 32505
1-800-962-7802
www.radiosouthrc.com
_____
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Pete Cosky
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:09 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR
In the instance of the Hitec Spectra module you would be correct as it was
using the Futaba RF section and therefore was not type certified. The
Spektrum modules only use the control input and are their own RF section not
using any of the 72 MHz section of the respective radio.
Now if Spektrum would bring one out for my Multiplex.
----- Original Message -----
From: Ron Van Putte <mailto:vanputte at cox.net>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:59
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR
On Feb 23, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Rex LESHER wrote:
No.... A system that is FCC approved is acceptable to the AMA.
I believe that's true IF the Spektrum people type certify their module in
each Futaba and JR transmitter it is intended for. It is my understanding
that each transmitter/module combination is another 'type'.
Ron Van Putte
----- Original Message -----
From: Vlad Camaev <mailto:vladc at review.com>
To: NSRCA Mailing List <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR
Would AMA void insurance if I'd use SPECTRUM module in my FUTABA radio?
That was the case when Hitec came out with SPECTRA module, it works great on
FUTABA, but since FUTABA won't approve it, this is against FCC rules and AMA
void insurance.
Vlad
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_____
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070223/c891df61/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list