[NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR

[J.Oddino]

I once calculated that we should be able to get 30 systems working in a one MHz band.  That would yield 2400 operating in the 2.4 GHz band.  Seems like the Spectrum should be better than advertised but who knows?  Maybe it is and they are being conservative.

Jim
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: george w. kennie 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:51 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR


  It sounded like XPS advocated an almost limitless number of simultaneous operational systems capability based on random channel coding.
  G.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: J.Oddino 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:40 PM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR


    I'm having a real problem understanding what an "unused frequency" is.  First of all nothing that transmits information transmits on one frequency as it must use a band of frequencies.  SS intentionally uses a wide band of frequencies and the wider this band is relative to the information bandwidth the more processing gain you get and that is good.  The Direct Sequence system "chips" the baseband information at some high rate with a pseudo random code that should be unique to your transmitter in order to spread the bandwidth.  With different codes it should therefore be possible to operate many RC systems simultaneously using the same band of frequencies. 

    Now getting back to "unused frequencies" , which we will interpret as unused channels about one megahertz wide, what happens if a system (not necessarily an RC system) that uses Frequency Hopping turns on and spreads its info over more than one channel?  Or just decides to use the same  channel that you are using?  Maybe the FCC rules prohibit this but I'd hate to depend on the government to make sure my airplane doesn't get shot down.  I've got to believe that "unused" really means that the ambient noise level is below some acceptable value and I'd like to think we can really operate a lot more than 40 users in an 80 MHz band.

    It sure would be nice to get an understandable, but more technical description of this system and its limitations.

    Jim O
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: JonLowe at aol.com 
      To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
      Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:26 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] SPECKTRUM Modules for Futaba and JR


      In a message dated 2/22/2007 6:52:04 PM Central Standard Time, patterndude at tx.rr.com writes:
        What does Spectral capacity - 40 systems mean?  Is this the number of tranmitters that can operate in range of each other, or is this 40 channels or what?
        --Lance

      This is grossly simplified, but the 2.4 ghz band has about 80 frequencies.  Each Spektrum unit picks two unused frequencies and transmits on both.  80/2=40 transmitters that can operate at once.  It is a requirement of the FCC that things on this band don't interfere with each other, and transmitter power is strictly regulated, therefore anything using the band has to check before transmitting.  You have no idea which two frequencies you are on (nor do you care), as they change each time the transmitter turns on.

      I've flown my Dad's Arresti III with the DX7 extensively.  Absolutely solid link, with no fear of getting shot down.  I have been waiting for something like the modules so I could use a decent transmitter for things like throttle curves, conditional mixes, etc.

      I don't want to be at a field that has 40 airplanes in the air at once!

      Jon Lowe





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.


      **************************************
      AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      No virus found in this incoming message.
      Checked by AVG Free Edition.
      Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007 1:26 PM



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/699 - Release Date: 2/23/2007 1:26 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070223/50b4d7d0/attachment.html