[NSRCA-discussion] Raw Scores (1987 NATS)

[Michael Wickizer]

I find this information interesting.  Today's competitive flyers are scoring 
higher as a % of total available; generally, mid to high 80's for the top 
flyers.  Glen Watson received the top round award for this year's NATs with 
a score in excess of 89%.  In Intermediate, Brett was flying in the low 
90's, but hasn't seen scores like that since.  So the obvious questions.  
Judging gotten easier, change in K factor assignment, equipment gotten 
better (like golf), or are the pilots actually better?


>From: "J N Hiller" <jnhiller at earthlink.net>
>Reply-To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Raw Scores (1987 NATS)
>Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:43:12 -0700
>
>Here is the attachment.
>Jim Hiller


><< 1987NATS.htm >>


>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion