[NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?

[Fred Huber]

It should... and evidence of why has shown in this discussion.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Gayer" <jgghome at comcast.net>
To: "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?


> That was always clear. The question is whether the rule should be changed
> John
>
> Glen Watson wrote:
>
>>There is no mandatory advancement from Masters...
>>
>>The following was copied from the current AMA rulebook...
>>
>>8.2.5. There is no mandatory advancement into FAI from the Masters class.
>>Contestants may enter their current AMA class or the FAI class at any
>>contest but not both.
>>
>>~Glen
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
>>seefo at san.rr.com
>>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:51 PM
>>To: NSRCA Mailing List
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
>>
>>
>>It seems to me the real question that must be answered (yet again) is:
>>
>>Is Masters a destination class or not?
>>
>>-Doug
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.19/953 - Release Date: 8/14/2007 
> 5:19 PM
>
>