[NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?

[John Gayer]

That was always clear. The question is whether the rule should be changed
John

Glen Watson wrote:

>There is no mandatory advancement from Masters...
>
>The following was copied from the current AMA rulebook...
>
>8.2.5. There is no mandatory advancement into FAI from the Masters class.
>Contestants may enter their current AMA class or the FAI class at any
>contest but not both.
>
>~Glen
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of
>seefo at san.rr.com
>Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:51 PM
>To: NSRCA Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] More flexibility in class selection?
>
>
>It seems to me the real question that must be answered (yet again) is:
>
>Is Masters a destination class or not? 
>
>-Doug
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>  
>