[NSRCA-discussion] Which is more normal?

[Archie Stafford]

I think most clubs ENCOURAGE people to try it out.  I think we'd be stupid
not to.  The only way to grow pattern is to get the people near you
interested....nothing worse than having people unable to use their field on
any given weekend...encourage it.  Let the guys feel like they are part of
something.  It really doesn't take that many club members to run a
successful contest.  It's very easy to rotate guys in and out, and this way,
the contest runs smoothly and pattern can gain some more friends.

Arch


-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Fred Huber
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2007 9:34 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Which is more normal?

Contests which limit participation by members of the host club

Contests which allow local clubmembers to compete in any class.

************

With "contestant judging"... is there any reason to limit the entry of 
people from the club that is hosting the contest?
With the host club supplying ALL of the judges... I could see a potential 
conflict.
But I can't see it being an issue if all contestants are potential judges.

Basily looking for thoughts/opinions before making a request for change at a

local contest for next year.  It changed from the club supplying almost all 
the judges, to contestant judging.

(that won't affect me for at least a couple of years... the contest has 
always allowed local members to enter at Sportsman...)

FHH 

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion