[NSRCA-discussion] Rule 8.1.1

[BUDDYonRC at aol.com]

Tony
My reply is.
The Nat's is an open event because that is what most fairly satisfies and  
serves all members of both AMA, NSRCA and all the other Sig's. The  Sig's run 
the events but not all entries belong to a Sig.  What qualifications would be 
required for non Sig entries should  pre qualification be required?
 
The Nat's last 6 weeks the events are run by the SIG's My question  is does 
AMA increase their staff for the Nat's, if so is that why they  would like to 
shorten the Nat's
 
I would think that the City of Muncie due to the economic benefits  that they 
receive from the Nat's and the Sig's due to a reduction in  participants 
would be the losers and for what? Isn't 46 weeks a year enough time  for the 
general membership to enjoy their investment in  AMA  Muncie
 
It would be interesting to know how many members use the facility excluding  
the Nat's in a year and how many visitors visit the site in a year
 
 
I was of the impression that the AMA was a member service organization and  
that many members belong specifically for the insurance But the Sig's are  the 
core of the organization even though a majority of members do not  belong to a 
Sig and couldn't care less if the Nat's were six weeks or six  month's long.
 

Are the politics. Intent and mission of the AMA changing to a point  where 
those in power are plotting a new direction for AMA and if so what  might that 
direction be?
 
Buddy Brammer
AMA 3889  
NSRCA 1810
 
 
. 
 
   



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20070430/179d91cb/attachment.html