[NSRCA-discussion] clarification

[Wayne]

Nope look again

#8 is shown as a 1/2 cuban 8 while #5 is a 1/2 reverse cuban. Look at the start of the figure its the circle. The end is the "T" at the end of the line.

I love the Aresti its so much better than the ribbon drawings! I know I'm tainted by IMAC but its really great that we now have the Pattern stuff in Aresti makes the change back and forth so much easier. Most IMAC guys would not know what a Double Immelmann is from a hole in the wall. But in Aresti he can see it and make it look like the picture. Done deal!

Bravo for the effort to bring AMA Pattern inline with the rest of the aerobatic world. Many have stated it on this list before aerobatics is aerobatics and its good that we can now speak the same language. Once you spend a little time looking at it its easy to read. In fact I think its easier than any of the other forms of drawing that guys have tried. Yes its not to scale but it gets the point across and we already know the radii must match and the rolls are centered on lines. The Aresti is the crib sheet, or the short hand method. Most IMAC pilots now use the Aresti as their call sheet.

Wayne
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Eddie Batchelor 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 7:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] clarification


  Looking at the aresti Troy posted on Flying Giants shows the break points at 6/7  & 11/12.
  He also show #5 & #8 as both 1/2 reverse cubans.  The description on NSRCA does state : #5 1/2 reverse cuban and #8 1/2 cuban. I agree with your assesment that switching 5 & 8 would be nice. That would place the 1/2 cuban just before the 2 loops , that;s where it is currently.
  Eddie 
    -----Original Message-----
    From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of John Pavlick
    Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 1:55 PM
    To: NSRCA Mailing List
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] clarification


    Georgie,
     Yeah that's the way I figured it should be too - box exit / enter between maneuvers 6 & 7 and 11 & 12. I'm still wondering about the 1/2 Cuban -> Cobra though.

    John Pavlick
    http://www.idseng.com
      

      -----Original Message-----
      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of george w. kennie
      Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 2:08 PM
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] clarification


      2007 Sportsman:
      Question: Is there supposed to be a box exit between maneuver 6 and maneuver 7?  It would seem that there must be as 6 is upwind and 7 is downwind, but there is no reference to it in the sequence as presented. 
      Also following this, maneuver # 8 is a 1/2 Cuban which brings you too far back into the box to allow for a straight line before the start of the required # 9 Cobra. If # 6 and # 8 are swapped, it would solve this problem. 
      Must be another box exit between 11 & 12 , but it's not indicated.
       Would Mr. Ramsey please help me out here  and shed a little light on my dilemma.
      Thank you Don,
      Georgie


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060925/a5314f89/attachment-0001.html