[NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question

george w. kennie geobet at gis.net
Thu Oct 19 15:24:21 AKDT 2006


Thanks for the reply Tom. I share your sentiments regarding the Lazulite. I really like the appearance of the Lazulite and a couple of years ago at the Nats Kenny Lauter had one and flew it in practice and quickly put it away and competed with his second airplane.I never did know the reason for his actions, might have been a trimming problem or whatever, but I sure thought it was a beauty.
Zero-zero scares me a little as I built one that way once and it flew badly.I struggled with it a long time and after doing numerous re-setups I finally changed the main
wing incidence and got it to fly acceptably.
Keep us posted as regards the outcome of both experiences. Like you, I have dabbled in a few of my own designs and am always interested in the empiricle results of others. 
Georgie



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Koenig, Tom 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question


  George,

  I really couldn't tell you- I still need to (finish) building them!!

  However, I was hoping that some of you boys in the US might have an answer to that? But I gather that the ratio of Partners to Lazulites is quite high in the US?

  I always wondered why there are relatively few Lazulites flying in the US. The Lazulite has a few differences, enough I guess for a selection of pilots. The wing sections are the same, but differ in percentages etc.

  George-as far as my expectations are concerned regarding pitch values, I'd expect them both to be about the same. As a rule of thumb, I would have thought the stab which is lower to pitch less-but there are enough differences in stab/wing and fuselage for it to perhaps be the same, i.e.: trimmable with a bit of incidence work.

  Incidentally-the marks on either fuselage suggest 0-0 wing stab???? I'd have to draw the fuselages up to see rigging angles.

  Tom
   -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of george w. kennie
  Sent: Wednesday, 18 October 2006 12:19 PM
  To: NSRCA Mailing List
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question


    Hey Tom,
    What are the differences in the mix values between these two models? Particularly pitch values. Your opinion please.
    Geo.



      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Koenig, Tom 
      To: NSRCA Mailing List 
      Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:16 PM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question


      Hello Claude and all,

      These are the measurements I came up with. Please-if anyone has other data it would be interesting to compare. First up nothing earth shattering as far as the numbers are concerned. Quite standard actually.

      Partner

      With reference to the canopy floor.

      Datum line/spinner center    56 mm below canopy line
      wing center                        92 mm below canopy line( or 36 mm below datum line)
      stab center                        63 mm below canopy line( or 7 mm below datum line)


      Lazulite

      With reference to the canopy floor.

      Datum line/spinner center    56 mm below canopy line
      wing center                        90 mm below canopy line( or 34 mm below datum line)
      stab center                       57 mm below canopy line( or 1 mm below datum line)

      I presume that with the stab center on the Lazulite, I may have made an error in measurement and that the stab is actually located ON the datum line( it was getting late!)


      The models are actually very similar, with a bit of coaxing the Lazulite Canopy will fit on a Partner and vice versa.

      I have not compared 1/4 chord to 1/4 chord moments-but if these are wanted I'll measure that up as well.

      The Lazulite was disgustingly close ( by millimeters) to my own Merlin design.I'm still kicking myself for the cash that was 'burnt'.

      Hope it is of help.


      Tom


        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Claude Weimer
        Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2006 8:52 AM
        To: 'NSRCA Mailing List'
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question


        Tom,

         

        No one else has responded.  I would really appreciate if you could give me the information. I can deal with metrics if that's what you use. 

         

        Thanks, Claude

         

         


------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Koenig, Tom
        Sent: Monday, October 16, 2006 4:20 PM
        To: NSRCA Mailing List
        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner set-up question

         

        Claude,

         

        Have you had any answers yet?

         

        If not-I'll measure up my unbuilt one and see what the numbers are. I hope they will make sense with the results from others?

         

        Tom

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Claude Weimer
        Sent: Monday, 16 October 2006 12:53 PM
        To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Partner setup question

        Can some one tell me the distance below the engine thrust line to the centerline of the wing on the Partner? And I would also like to know the distance above the wing centerline to the center of the horizontal stab. Thanks, Claude. 

              ************************************************************************
              *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
              be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
              copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
              dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
              prohibited without the consent of the sender.

              WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
              outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
              is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
              Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
              viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
              affected attachments.

              Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
              individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
              and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
              organisation.
              ************************************************************************
             

            ************************************************************************
            *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
            be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
            copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
            dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
            prohibited without the consent of the sender.

            WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
            outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
            is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
            Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
            viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
            affected attachments.

            Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
            individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
            and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
            organisation.
            ************************************************************************
           



--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
        ************************************************************************
        *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may
        be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
        copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
        dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
        prohibited without the consent of the sender.

        WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep
        outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
        is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
        Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
        viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
        affected attachments.

        Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
        individual sender, except where the sender expressly,
        and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
        organisation.
        ************************************************************************
       



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061019/32e8decc/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list