[NSRCA-discussion] 14 MZ Battery

Ted Sander tedsander at comcast.net
Thu Nov 16 18:58:58 AKST 2006


And on mine, I get 15 min to 1/2hr more run time from the Sony.  Not a claim
that they all have more capacity.  I may just have a "good" Sony, and a
"not-quite-so-good" Futaba.

 

Ted Sander

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Gerald
Gallagher
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:48 PM
To: bladesmith at mindspring.com; 'NSRCA Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 14 MZ Battery

 

I have been using this battery 
(Sony FP-570) for over a year with no problems at all.

 

 

Jerry Gallagher

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Erik
Newsholme
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:23 PM
To: nsrca-discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 14 MZ Battery

  

Careful of the exact specs from the Sony website for the NP-570 Battery.
I'm not a battery wizard but the Futaba folks put a 7.4v proprietary battery
in the 14 mz not a 7.2v battery.  I'm sure it is just splitting hairs but
maybe someone can tell us all why there is .2v difference in the 2
batteries.  We all want to save money on our stuff but there is a saying of
"penny wise and pound foolish".

 

Just like putting cheap switches in our $2,000-$3000 birds.  Does it make
since sometimes what we do.  

 

Just a thought.

 

 

Erik 

bladesmith at mindspring.com

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061117/5c244533/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list