[NSRCA-discussion] Changing list behavior.

Mon Mar 27 05:25:37 AKST 2006

DVD's
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: jivey61 at bellsouth.net 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:20 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Changing list behavior.

  Hmmmm.....if the list behavior needs changing let's call it ..."Boys Gone Bad"  and sell CD's.

  Jim Ivey
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Grow Pattern 
    To: NSRCA Mailing List 
    Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:12 AM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Changing list behavior.

    Jim,
           I'm not anti-electric. But if I reported that I had blown a rod on a YS DZ I perceive that I would get a different reaction than if I report a problem with an electric motor or its set-up. 

    If I succeeded in getting one pilot to take care of their batteries in a safer way then it was worth running the gauntlet of my usual critics on this list.

    Regards,

    Eric.

    BTW - Rules proposals are the last thing on my mind. I'll leave that to the NSRCA board and the survey results etc. Nor would I want to separate pilots. Rewarding private and funded pilots is a different issue.
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Jim Woodward 
      To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 
      Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 7:42 AM
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Changing list behavior.

      Hey Eric,

      After your last emails about the charging incident, I was sure you'd follow it up with some sort of rule change proposal.  I was guessing you would start with an outright ban on electrics J, and not a separation of pilots.

      Jim

      James R. Woodward

      Schroth Safety Products

      Engineering & Customer Support Manager

      1371 SW 8th St. Unit 3

      Pompano Beach, FL 33069

      Cell: (954) 319-0873

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Grow Pattern
      Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:12 PM
      To: NSRCA Mailing List
      Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Changing list behavior.

      I have noticed a behavioral change in this discussion list over the years when it comes to electric power. There was always some polarization to Radios and engines etc.

      What I noticed most was that the glow era engine owners were very willing to report their engine failures and a whole myriad of engine fixes and preventative medicine.

      I still see the latter but not as much of the failure reporting. I put this down to sponsored pilot behavior with all products. I also noted a change at the top. Now most all the pilots are sponsored in one form or another. We always had a few sponsored pilots but now the unsponsored pilot is the exception.

      Maybe it is time to have a Pro-Am separation in the awards?

      I also noticed that the list does a lot more advertising/selling that it was ever intended to. That may be or not may be a good thing.

      Judging by my off-list in-box a lot of folks do not post on the list what they think for fear of retributional responses. "Nil illegitium carborundom men!"

      Regards,

      Eric.

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: George Kennie 

        To: NSRCA Mailing List 

        Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:51 PM

        Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Dodged a Bullet Today!!!!

        Nope!,...... I think that I might have also had a similar experience with the Astro charger. 
        I had a pak that had been in storage for about 3 weeks and decided to top it off before flying, but noticed when I connected it to the charger that it started out at the maximum voltage and started increasing from there into territory I had never seen before.Recognizing that I had never seen voltages this high displayed on the screen before, I immediately terminated the charge. This all happened within a period of 15-20 seconds. 
        G. 

        jeffghughes at comcast.net wrote: 

           What everybody is assuming is that this was a screw up.It could also just have been a bad cell The manual does say not to put a fully charged pack on the charger and discharge first if any doubt.  

          -------------- Original message -------------- 
          From: Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com> 
          I can't say how the charger works, but my uneducated guess would be that the voltage rise (internal impedance) with the application of current would be different between charged/uncharged cells. 

          Grow Pattern <pattern4u at comcast.net> wrote: 

            What still bothers me is:- If 3 fully charged cells = 12 V plus, and 4 
            discharged cells = 12 V Plus, then how does the charger know which is which?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

          Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Dodged a Bullet Today!!!! 
          Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:19:38 +0000 
          From: Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com> 
          To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 

_______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion  

------------------------------------------------------------------------

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060327/b1a3b5ea/attachment-0001.html 