[NSRCA-discussion] Noise - Overfly - and DifferentAerobatic Model Types

Ron Lockhart ronlock at comcast.net
Fri Mar 3 13:13:55 AKST 2006


Agree that the perception of danger is greater with larger birds.  
In who's hands is a significant factor, but all of them are flown on clothes pin "controlled" frequencies.

Ron Lockhart
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jay Marshall 
  To: 'NSRCA Mailing List' 
  Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:07 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Noise - Overfly - and DifferentAerobatic Model Types


  Don't overlook that absolute noise is not the only factor. A big, noisy plane has the perception of danger to the unknowing. In some hands its more than just a perception. 

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
  Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 7:35 AM
  To: NSRCA Mailing List
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Noise - Overfly - and Different Aerobatic Model Types

   

  Dean,

   

  Right on point. I've been involved with a flying field lost due to noise, and was also involved in a successful fight to keep a field open after neighbor's complaints. Better to be reasonably quiet in the first place. Once you have upset the neighbors to the point that they start to complain, their "threshold of pain" becomes much lower. Once they have made up their minds they don't like you, they probably never will like you again, regardless of what you do.

   

  The one - maybe the only - big negative that I see with IMAC is the noise level along with the noise footprint.  But, you know, 20 years ago you could say the same thing about pattern. I just hope the guys in IMAC (and giant scale in general) can learn from the mistakes made in pattern --  BEFORE flying fields are lost for both camps!

   

  Bob R.



  Dean Pappas <d.pappas at kodeos.com> wrote:

    Hi Dave,
    What I hope we are saying here, is that being smart and making our aerobatic planes quiet is good for the continued survival of both events. Of course, if flyers with large, loud, and far-away 40% planes lose all our practice fields and practice sites ...

    This is just how the West Windsor contest in Jersey became a "first annual and only ever" event.
    Sadly, I have to say that two or three IMACers joined the club, and within a few months, we had no Pattern Contest, a 6:00 P.M. weekday curfew on wet power, and neighbors who are now very aware of our existence. Being noticed ain't always a good thing! Smart noise abatement programs are aimed at preventing that first complaint. Once it happens, it's almost too late.
    ..............................

   



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060303/3b45e9e9/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list