[NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting

[Del K. Rykert]

Hi Joe..
    Is up to Doctors at this point..  I hope it might be this year..

                 Del
          nsrca - 473

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Lachowski" <jlachow at hotmail.com>
To: <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting


> Georgie (Del too),
>
> The real question and challenge is:  When are we going to see you on the 
> flight line at at least 3 or 4 contests in D1 this year?<g>
>
>
>>From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
>>Reply-To: geobet at gis.net,        NSRCA Mailing List 
>><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
>>Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:42:07 -0500
>>
>>Well,...... everybody,
>>I'm very gratified for all the responces to the redistricting thread.
>>I think that I probably have a far too narrow perspective regarding the 
>>overall
>>picture, however the original intent was to generate discussion and I'm 
>>happy
>>for that.
>>Many points were really of significant merit both for and against and I 
>>suspect
>>that there is no real solution to the problem or at least not one that 
>>would be
>>acceptable to everyone.
>>Funny, .......the last one who I thought would agree with the concept was 
>>Van
>>Putte and I was somewhat thrilled that he really had full grasp of the
>>interpretive intent, wow.......and for everyone's efforts to share their
>>viewpoints, my thanks!
>>G.
>>
>>Jay Marshall wrote:
>>
>> > I have heard of districts which allow anyone to compete for their
>> > "championship", regardless of where they are "registered". I don't 
>> > know,
>> > however, if points scored in these contests can be transferred back to
>>the
>> > winner's district. That doesn't seem right as it would allow double
>>rewards
>> > for a single contest. It would seem best that points won in a district
>>stay
>> > there. If you want to try for two championships then you would have to
>> > compete in twice as many contests.
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>> > [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van
>>Putte
>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:46 PM
>> > To: NSRCA Mailing List
>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
>> >
>> > On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:27 PM, George Kennie wrote:
>> >
>> > > It could be inferred that the District Champion aludes to a "person"
>> > > of exceptional championship calibre who resides within the District
>> > > confines irrespective of the location of competitive endeavor.To
>> > > achieve the title requires participation in competitive enterprize
>> > > that validates the award. Where the effort takes place should not be
>> > > in the equation to be truly justified.You are "Champion" by virtue
>> > > of your demonstrated skill level irrespective of where that
>> > > demonstration took place, not because it occurred on "Joe's
>> > > Ballfield".
>> > > We already allow one out of District event which at least partly
>> > > negates the "local geography" issue.
>> > > The improvement sought here is to make it easier for people in large
>> > > geographical Districts to "District Hop" to contests that are closer
>> > > to their place of residence than contests that would require them to
>> > > travel in excess of 12 hours to stay within District limits. That's
>> > > known as a hardship guys!
>> >
>> > George is on to something here.  The question is:  Who is our District
>> > Champion?  There are possible two answers.  The first reflects which
>> > member of the district scores the most points in contests held within
>> > the district.  The second reflects which member of the district scores
>> > the most points in contests, no matter where they are held.  I believe
>> > the second answer is the proper one.  The individual who gets the most
>> > points, no matter the location, demonstrates his superiority over the
>> > competition.  That's my definition of a champion.
>> >
>> > I must admit that my district's point totals do not allow
>> > out-of-district contests to be included in the total.  It used to be
>> > that one out-of-district contest's results were allowed to be included.
>> >   Just when it changed, I don't remember, but I wish it could be 
>> > changed
>> > to allow points earned in any contest, no matter the district.
>> >
>> > Ron Van Putte
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>