[NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
George Kennie
geobet at gis.net
Fri Jan 6 09:13:22 AKST 2006
Joe,
Thanks for inquiring. Since 9/11 my financial resources took a tremendous hit (
heard a congressman last nite on TV that informed me that I'm living below the
poverty level), so I try to save up so that I can make it to the Nat's. That way
I can get to see EVERYBODY ! Not really a sob story, just the reality of
things. Maybe I'm being tested a little, which is O.K.
Georgie
Joe Lachowski wrote:
> Georgie (Del too),
>
> The real question and challenge is: When are we going to see you on the
> flight line at at least 3 or 4 contests in D1 this year?<g>
>
> >From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> >Reply-To: geobet at gis.net, NSRCA Mailing List
> ><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> >To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
> >Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:42:07 -0500
> >
> >Well,...... everybody,
> >I'm very gratified for all the responces to the redistricting thread.
> >I think that I probably have a far too narrow perspective regarding the
> >overall
> >picture, however the original intent was to generate discussion and I'm
> >happy
> >for that.
> >Many points were really of significant merit both for and against and I
> >suspect
> >that there is no real solution to the problem or at least not one that
> >would be
> >acceptable to everyone.
> >Funny, .......the last one who I thought would agree with the concept was
> >Van
> >Putte and I was somewhat thrilled that he really had full grasp of the
> >interpretive intent, wow.......and for everyone's efforts to share their
> >viewpoints, my thanks!
> >G.
> >
> >Jay Marshall wrote:
> >
> > > I have heard of districts which allow anyone to compete for their
> > > "championship", regardless of where they are "registered". I don't know,
> > > however, if points scored in these contests can be transferred back to
> >the
> > > winner's district. That doesn't seem right as it would allow double
> >rewards
> > > for a single contest. It would seem best that points won in a district
> >stay
> > > there. If you want to try for two championships then you would have to
> > > compete in twice as many contests.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> > > [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van
> >Putte
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:46 PM
> > > To: NSRCA Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
> > >
> > > On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:27 PM, George Kennie wrote:
> > >
> > > > It could be inferred that the District Champion aludes to a "person"
> > > > of exceptional championship calibre who resides within the District
> > > > confines irrespective of the location of competitive endeavor.To
> > > > achieve the title requires participation in competitive enterprize
> > > > that validates the award. Where the effort takes place should not be
> > > > in the equation to be truly justified.You are "Champion" by virtue
> > > > of your demonstrated skill level irrespective of where that
> > > > demonstration took place, not because it occurred on "Joe's
> > > > Ballfield".
> > > > We already allow one out of District event which at least partly
> > > > negates the "local geography" issue.
> > > > The improvement sought here is to make it easier for people in large
> > > > geographical Districts to "District Hop" to contests that are closer
> > > > to their place of residence than contests that would require them to
> > > > travel in excess of 12 hours to stay within District limits. That's
> > > > known as a hardship guys!
> > >
> > > George is on to something here. The question is: Who is our District
> > > Champion? There are possible two answers. The first reflects which
> > > member of the district scores the most points in contests held within
> > > the district. The second reflects which member of the district scores
> > > the most points in contests, no matter where they are held. I believe
> > > the second answer is the proper one. The individual who gets the most
> > > points, no matter the location, demonstrates his superiority over the
> > > competition. That's my definition of a champion.
> > >
> > > I must admit that my district's point totals do not allow
> > > out-of-district contests to be included in the total. It used to be
> > > that one out-of-district contest's results were allowed to be included.
> > > Just when it changed, I don't remember, but I wish it could be changed
> > > to allow points earned in any contest, no matter the district.
> > >
> > > Ron Van Putte
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list