[NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting

[Joe Lachowski]

Georgie (Del too),

The real question and challenge is:  When are we going to see you on the 
flight line at at least 3 or 4 contests in D1 this year?<g>


>From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
>Reply-To: geobet at gis.net,        NSRCA Mailing List 
><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>To: NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
>Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 13:42:07 -0500
>
>Well,...... everybody,
>I'm very gratified for all the responces to the redistricting thread.
>I think that I probably have a far too narrow perspective regarding the 
>overall
>picture, however the original intent was to generate discussion and I'm 
>happy
>for that.
>Many points were really of significant merit both for and against and I 
>suspect
>that there is no real solution to the problem or at least not one that 
>would be
>acceptable to everyone.
>Funny, .......the last one who I thought would agree with the concept was 
>Van
>Putte and I was somewhat thrilled that he really had full grasp of the
>interpretive intent, wow.......and for everyone's efforts to share their
>viewpoints, my thanks!
>G.
>
>Jay Marshall wrote:
>
> > I have heard of districts which allow anyone to compete for their
> > "championship", regardless of where they are "registered". I don't know,
> > however, if points scored in these contests can be transferred back to 
>the
> > winner's district. That doesn't seem right as it would allow double 
>rewards
> > for a single contest. It would seem best that points won in a district 
>stay
> > there. If you want to try for two championships then you would have to
> > compete in twice as many contests.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> > [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron Van 
>Putte
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:46 PM
> > To: NSRCA Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Re: redistricting
> >
> > On Jan 4, 2006, at 12:27 PM, George Kennie wrote:
> >
> > > It could be inferred that the District Champion aludes to a "person"
> > > of exceptional championship calibre who resides within the District
> > > confines irrespective of the location of competitive endeavor.To
> > > achieve the title requires participation in competitive enterprize
> > > that validates the award. Where the effort takes place should not be
> > > in the equation to be truly justified.You are "Champion" by virtue
> > > of your demonstrated skill level irrespective of where that
> > > demonstration took place, not because it occurred on "Joe's
> > > Ballfield".
> > > We already allow one out of District event which at least partly
> > > negates the "local geography" issue.
> > > The improvement sought here is to make it easier for people in large
> > > geographical Districts to "District Hop" to contests that are closer
> > > to their place of residence than contests that would require them to
> > > travel in excess of 12 hours to stay within District limits. That's
> > > known as a hardship guys!
> >
> > George is on to something here.  The question is:  Who is our District
> > Champion?  There are possible two answers.  The first reflects which
> > member of the district scores the most points in contests held within
> > the district.  The second reflects which member of the district scores
> > the most points in contests, no matter where they are held.  I believe
> > the second answer is the proper one.  The individual who gets the most
> > points, no matter the location, demonstrates his superiority over the
> > competition.  That's my definition of a champion.
> >
> > I must admit that my district's point totals do not allow
> > out-of-district contests to be included in the total.  It used to be
> > that one out-of-district contest's results were allowed to be included.
> >   Just when it changed, I don't remember, but I wish it could be changed
> > to allow points earned in any contest, no matter the district.
> >
> > Ron Van Putte
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion