[NSRCA-discussion] Hyde type C mount?

Ed Alt ed_alt at hotmail.com
Thu Feb 9 03:47:56 AKST 2006


I know about Jerry's mount, I've got one, getting another, but this is for a guy starting in pattern who is building a Focus II.  Needs a mount that doesn't require a nose ring.

Ed
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: brett terry 
  To: NSRCA Mailing List 
  Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 7:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Hyde type C mount?


  Jerry won't specifically say this, but if you want a high-quality mount ata  very reasonable price you should look at his mounts.

    --www.buddengineering.com--




  On 2/9/06, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
    Thanks Jerry.  I'm looking for inexpensive alternatives for a friend getting
    into Pattern and the C mount sounded like it could do the trick.  I think I
    will try to guide him to an A type (it's going in a FOCUS II). 

    Ed
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Jerry Budd" <jerry at buddengineering.com>
    To: "NSRCA Mailing List" < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
    Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 12:27 AM
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Hyde type C mount?


    > Hi Ed,
    >
    > They're not listed on the Central Hobbies web site (at least as of 
    > last weekend) but I'm sure they will be soon.  They're shown on
    > Central Hobbies back cover ad in the latest K-Factor at around $60.
    > The ad states the mounts have several of the features my mounts do 
    > such as standardized mounting dimensions, pre-drilled motor
    > attachment holes, replaceable aluminum mounting rails, and a light
    > weight of around 3 oz (for the version that requires a nose ring, the 
    > non-nose ring version weighs somewhat more).
    >
    > Isn't it amazing what a little bit of competition will do to the market?
    > :-)
    >
    > Anyway, what I'd be careful about is that the ad only claims a 35% 
    > reduction in transmitted vibration (it's unclear what the reference
    > point is, one can only assume compared to a hard mounted motor).
    > Anyway, that's not very good, and in some cases it could excite a 
    > structural resonance frequency of the airframe and actually amplify
    > the transmitted vibration.  I don't think in most cases it will, but
    > as the stiffness of a soft mount approaches that of a rigid mount, 
    > the question becomes, " what is the point of using a soft mount if it
    > doesn't filter out the unwanted vibration?".
    >
    > There's some other claims in the ad that IMHO I don't think are 
    > accurate (or defendable), but that's a topic of discussion for
    > another time, and maybe a different forum.
    >
    > FWIW - For those who have been very patiently waiting, I'm in the
    > process of procuring some prototypes of the nose ring support for my 
    > soft motor mounts for proof testing.  I'd like to think I'll have
    > them available within a month or two but I won't know for sure until
    > the testing is completed (hopefully soon - this has taken way too 
    > long!).
    >
    > Thx, Jerry
    >
    >
    >>I apologize if this is repeat topic, but someone mentioned recently
    >>that Hyde had a new, cheaper, non-nose ring  mount (type C?).
    >>Someting like $70 at Central? I don't see it on their website 
    >>though.  Do I have this right?
    >>
    >>Thanks
    >>Ed
    >
    > --
    > ___________
    > Jerry Budd
    > Budd Engineering
    > (661) 722-5669 Voice/Fax
    > (661) 435-0358 Cell Phone 
    > mailto:jerry at buddengineering.com
    > http://www.buddengineering.com
    > _______________________________________________ 
    > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
    >
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060209/b9f28913/attachment.html 


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list