[NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Wed Dec 6 06:22:53 AKST 2006
On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:53 AM, JShulman wrote:
> Yea... we are both getting old Dave...lol.
Rookies! I have some shoes older than you guys.
Ron Van Putte
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of DaveL322 at comcast.net
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:34 AM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
> You flew back in 85? You must be getting old!!!
>
> I also flew Sportsman (402) at the 85 Nats, my first Nats. <G>
>
> Dave
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
> Only for the fact that I finished the contest and still had a plane
> (finished last I think). I would have continued in 401, but they
> didn't have it at the 85 Nats, so had to move up.
>
> Anyway, make sure not to get stuck just trying one technique for
> doing a snap. Try all sorts of set-ups and inputs. You'll find one
> that works for you.
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ken Thompson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:07 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
> Guess that makes you pretty special...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: JShulman
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 8:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
> 401... the only time I flew 401 was when I was 7 years old (81
> Jamesburg contest). And I don't think I was 2nd. You sure it wasn't
> 402?
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:50 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
>
> Jason
>
> Your lack of a halo can be tracked back to that 401 contest that
> you came in second against some "Old Guy"-probably 40 or so.
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
> Radome and Composites Engineering
> Raytheon
>
>
> "JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
> Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> 12/05/2006 02:29 PM
> Please respond to
> NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
>
> To
> "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> cc
> Subject
> Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
>
>
>
>
> No wonder why I can't roll my snaps and score...
>
> Regards,
> Jason
> www.jasonshulman.com
> www.shulmanaviation.com
> www.composite-arf.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-
> discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:59 PM
> To: NSRCA Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
>
> Keith
>
> Proper execution, and thus good scoring of this manuever requires
> years of preparation. First you must win both 402 and 403 at the
> nationals hands down....no doubt about it, back to back then win
> Masters the followin year in the same manner. This creates the
> desired halo effect which will then allow you simply "roll" through
> this manuever without getting a zero.
>
>
>
> Gray Fowler
> Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
> Radome and Composites EngineeringRayt heon
>
> "Keith Black" <tkeithblack at gmail.com>
> Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> 12/05/2006 01:48 PM
> Please respond to
> NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
>
> To
> "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> cc
> Subject
> [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I've seen many discussions on single snaps (pull elevator first,
> follow with rudder and ailerons, and even some say reduce ailerons
> and elevator as rotations begins, etc., etc.), but I've never seen
> any discussion specifically regarding the 1 1/2 snap.
>
> This year's Masters pattern has the 45 degree down 1 1/2 snap. I've
> gotten pretty good at both the inverted and upright 45 degree
> single snap but this 1 1/2 snap is a different animal in that the
> up elevator that initiates the snap will cause the nose to drop
> after the last 1/2 rotation if it's left in too long. I've not
> flown it too many times, but the few times I've tried it I played
> with pulling out the elevator and putting in a little down to try
> and hold the nose on at 45 degree angle.
>
> I'm curious to hear others thoughts on how to execute this 1 1/2 on
> the 45 degree downline and keep the 45 degree heading.
>
> Thanks,
> Keith Black _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061206/b91bcfe0/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list