[NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
JShulman
jshulman at cfl.rr.com
Tue Dec 5 18:30:47 AKST 2006
I don't think they were different rules, but we didn't have a rule book. At
the time, Sportsman was only a few more maneuvers more than Novice was
anyway.
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ken Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:26 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
I suppose current rules make it easier on contestants. If a contest
doesn't offer your level, ie Sportsman, you can fly in Intermediate and move
back to Sportsman at the next contest, inclusive of the Nats.
I didn't realize rules were different in '85.;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: JShulman
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
Only for the fact that I finished the contest and still had a plane
(finished last I think). I would have continued in 401, but they didn't have
it at the 85 Nats, so had to move up.
Anyway, make sure not to get stuck just trying one technique for doing a
snap. Try all sorts of set-ups and inputs. You'll find one that works for
you.
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ken Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:07 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
Guess that makes you pretty special...
----- Original Message -----
From: JShulman
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
401... the only time I flew 401 was when I was 7 years old (81
Jamesburg contest). And I don't think I was 2nd. You sure it wasn't 402?
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:50 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
Jason
Your lack of a halo can be tracked back to that 401 contest that
you came in second against some "Old Guy"-probably 40 or so.
Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon
"JShulman" <jshulman at cfl.rr.com>
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
12/05/2006 02:29 PM Please respond to
NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
To "NSRCA Mailing List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
cc
Subject Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
No wonder why I can't roll my snaps and score...
Regards,
Jason
www.jasonshulman.com
www.shulmanaviation.com
www.composite-arf.com
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Gray E Fowler
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:59 PM
To: NSRCA Mailing List
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
Keith
Proper execution, and thus good scoring of this manuever requires
years of preparation. First you must win both 402 and 403 at the nationals
hands down....no doubt about it, back to back then win Masters the followin
year in the same manner. This creates the desired halo effect which will
then allow you simply "roll" through this manuever without getting a zero.
Gray Fowler
Senior Principal Chemical Engineer
Radome and Composites Engineering
Raytheon
"Keith Black" <tkeithblack at gmail.com>
Sent by: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
12/05/2006 01:48 PM
Please respond to
NSRCA Mailing List <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
To "NSRCA Mailing List"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
cc
Subject [NSRCA-discussion] 1 1/2 snap technique
I've seen many discussions on single snaps (pull elevator first,
follow with rudder and ailerons, and even some say reduce ailerons and
elevator as rotations begins, etc., etc.), but I've never seen any
discussion specifically regarding the 1 1/2 snap.
This year's Masters pattern has the 45 degree down 1 1/2 snap.
I've gotten pretty good at both the inverted and upright 45 degree single
snap but this 1 1/2 snap is a different animal in that the up elevator that
initiates the snap will cause the nose to drop after the last 1/2 rotation
if it's left in too long. I've not flown it too many times, but the few
times I've tried it I played with pulling out the elevator and putting in a
little down to try and hold the nose on at 45 degree angle.
I'm curious to hear others thoughts on how to execute this 1 1/2
on the 45 degree downline and keep the 45 degree heading.
Thanks,
Keith Black _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.9/571 - Release Date: 12/5/2006
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20061206/7bf7dca3/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list