[NSRCA-discussion] New YS ???

[vicenterc at comcast.net]

I have the following questions:

1.  Do we really need more power than the YS 160 DZ for pattern?  Please don't tell me that "more power is always better".  I know that one.  Probably, it is required for some F3A maneuvers and I don't know because I don't fly F3A.

2.  Is the YS 170 a complete new redesign?  If not, I assume that YS is using the same components of the YS 160 DZ.  If that is the case, I will wonder how the same mechanical parts are going to take the additional forces of the more powerful engine.  I am sure that YS have been doing research and testing.

Regards,

Vicente "Vince" Bortone

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: adriancwong at earthlink.net 

> 170 should start production in early 07. YS is trying to finish fulfilling the 
> back orders of the 160. 
> 
> Believe me, the motor is powerful, even more so than the 160. I've seen two of 
> them ran at a contest two weeks ago, scary power. 
> 
> Adrian 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> >From: Adam Glatt 
> >Sent: Aug 13, 2006 6:18 PM 
> >To: NSRCA Mailing List 
> >Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New YS ??? 
> > 
> >As an electric guy who has seen the YS 170 in two big competitions now 
> >(France WC and 06 Muncie), I believe the 170 can be used to fly pattern 
> >just as well as any electric motor. The pattern will look a little 
> >different, of course, but it can be just as good or better: see Onda and 
> >CPLR. 
> >-Adam 
> > 
> >Koenig, Tom wrote: 
> >> Hello again Pattern world, 
> >> 
> >> Since everyone is talking about electric power these days-I thought 
> >> I'd throw out this question. 
> >> 
> >> Is there a new YS being planned that anyone knows of or is testing? Troy? 
> >> 
> >> I don't believe the 170 is slated for release, nor do I believe this 
> >> will be an adequate 'competitor' for the current generation of 'E' 
> >> power plants. I would have thought Yamada San would need to work on 
> >> something that would blow our socks off. The OS 200 4 stroke is 
> >> supposed to be on its way-but so is Christmas!! 
> >> 
> >> Anyone in the know? 
> >> 
> >> Tom 
> >> ************************************************************************ 
> >> *PLEASE NOTE* This email and any attachments may 
> >> be confidential. If received in error, please delete all 
> >> copies and advise the sender. The reproduction or 
> >> dissemination of this email or its attachments is 
> >> prohibited without the consent of the sender. 
> >> 
> >> WARNING RE VIRUSES: Our computer systems sweep 
> >> outgoing email to guard against viruses, but no warranty 
> >> is given that this email or its attachments are virus free. 
> >> Before opening or using attachments, please check for 
> >> viruses. Our liability is limited to the re-supply of any 
> >> affected attachments. 
> >> 
> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the 
> >> individual sender, except where the sender expressly, 
> >> and with authority, states them to be the views of the 
> >> organisation. 
> >> ************************************************************************ 
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> >> 
> >_______________________________________________ 
> >NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> >NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> >http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20060813/29f37ee6/attachment.html