INCIDENCE settings
Ron Van Putte
vanputte at cox.net
Fri Sep 30 12:35:58 AKDT 2005
On Sep 30, 2005, at 12:39 PM, Bob Richards wrote:
> That is a pet peeve of mine as well.
>
> Remember the Hobie Hawk glider? It flew nose down -- WAY down. It was
> designed that way. It was not a balance issue at all.
I do remember the Hobie Hawk and how it flew.
A J-3 Cub on a proper final approach looks nose-down as well, but many
pilots won't let it come in that way. As a result, they'll never enjoy
a wheel landing on a Cub.
Ron Van Putte
> Ron Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>> This discussion also tapped into one of my pet peeves: Guy sees an
>> airplane flying around with the tail low and announces, "That airplane
>> is tail heavy". Probably wrong. The incidence relationship between
>> the wing and the horizontal tail is probably incorrect. The CG has an
>> effect, but the condition is usually caused by a bad trim setup. Now I
>> feel better.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 956 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050930/e019e0fc/attachment.bin
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list