What constitutes an FAI flyer.
Keith Black
tkeithb at comcast.net
Fri Nov 11 00:45:05 AKST 2005
Eric,
I think you bring up a really interesting point. I'm afraid this topic may upset some FAI pilots, but it does seem strange to have a game with two halves and only play the second half once a year at NATS.
What do other countries do? Do they fly finals at local contests?
Keith Black
----- Original Message -----
From: Grow Pattern
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 10:46 PM
Subject: What constitutes an FAI flyer.
This question has been going around in my mind since they came up with P-01 and F-01 and FAI wrote it up so that we, the USA, only fly the Finals at the Nat's or team trials.
In the (my) old days they had schedules A,B, C etc right up to E. The A-schedule was flown for two years with the new B-schedule as the finals schedule. Then the B was flown for two years with the C as the finals schedule and so on.
Nowadays MOST FAI pilots really only fly the preliminary schedules. Next year it will by P-07. If most of the FAI pilots only compete with a P-schedule then I would submit that there is not much difference between an FAI pilot and a Masters pilot. Unless they make it into a Nat's or Team trials final (or semi final maybe).
So maybe we are only being typically liberal and just spinning our wheels with a 406 class or perhaps I have been ignoring the obvious for years and I should accept that the P-series should be our Masters series.
If not then maybe we should start running F-schedules on Sundays for FAI pilots flying AMA 406 at local contests.
Lets face it you either are an FAI pilot or you are not. Just flying P-07 next year is like being half an FAI pilot!!!!.
Looking to create a debate and hear what you think. Don't really want to upset the middle order of FAI pilots or create a fight, but definitively wanting to be a shade contentious.
Regards.
Eric.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20051111/eab44ca1/attachment-0001.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list