dBa or dbC for noise measurements?

[vicenterc at comcast.net]

OK, that is why I could not find it.  I was looking at the on line information.
Vince
-------------- Original message -------------- 

Vince

It's in the sound addendum, last page of the '02-'04 rules, I'm don't see it in the current online rules.

Earl
----- Original Message ----- 
From: vicenterc at comcast.net 
To: discussion at nsrca.org ; discussion at nsrca.org 
Cc: Earl Haury 
Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: dBa or dbC for noise measurements?


Earl,

Do you know where in AMA rule book?  In the pattern there is not mention.  IMAC clearly specs. dbA.

Thanks,

Vince

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> dBA is what is specified in the AMA & F3A rules. 
> 
> Earl 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ed White" 
> To: 
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2005 8:21 AM 
> Subject: Re: dBa or dbC for noise measurements? 
> 
> 
> > Use dBA. It more closely approximates the 
> > characteristics of the human ear and is commonly used 
> > when noise measurements are taken. 
> > 
> > Ed 
> > 
> > --- vicenterc at comcast.net wrote: 
> >> Just a question. What weighted factor should be use 
> >> for precision aerobatics AMA noise measurements? 
> >> dBA or dBC. I think is dBA and was discussed a long 
> >> time ago but I forgot. 
> >> <BR 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050529/59c0b6d1/attachment-0001.html