calling complete for new takeoff

[RUDDERCABL at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/17/2005 2:50:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
atwoodm at paragon-inc.com writes:
Regarding the actual “Vote”…the FINAL voting forms do not contain ANY…I 
mean ANY of the rational that is submitted for the rule…JUST the text of the rule 
change. 
 
For new members of the contest board (Vern and I) it took a fair bit of work 
calling different proposer’s to understand the motivations of some. (most are 
straight forward, but there were a few that seemed out of left field.)
 
I would imagine in future votes, being part of the entire process will help, 
but there will always be the chance of a new board member getting into the 
game late and having to make decisions.
 
It was interesting to me that ALL of the IMAC rule change proposals came from 
the sig…there were NO independent proposals to confuse things, and I believe 
their changed passed with a clean slate.
 
Mark

Thank-you for your explanation. Now I am just a little less "uninformed" ! 

Robert Gainey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050518/c5d42924/attachment.html