Another box rule (discussion)
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Rcmaster199 at aol.com
Thu Mar 10 08:19:56 AKST 2005
In pattern there is a hard rule that has been passed by the CB. It's called
the "1 pt per 15 degree " rule, and pattern judges apply the rule fairly well
to center maneuvers at least. Most of the top judges in pattern try hard NOT
to judge " by impression", but rather by the Downgrade Guidelines that have
been established. The downgrades are often discussed at judging seminars and
a handout of downgrades is given to attendees. Also a list of mandatory
zeroes is given to same. To return back to impression judging would be to take a
step backwards to 20 years ago.
MattK
In a message dated 3/10/2005 1:06:32 AM Eastern Standard Time,
joddino at socal.rr.com writes:
It seems to me that the guy who puts the airplane where the judges can see
it should score better than the guys that fly out in the next county. And it
is no more difficult to judge the ends of a square box than it is to judge
the backline of the vee. And who doesn't judge by impression? The rules don't
specify that things like roll rates, altitudes. and radii need to be the
same on all maneuvers but we are not impressed if they vary all over the map
from maneuver to maneuver. I say forget the box but downgrade like mad for
someone that is out of control on positioning and that includes being too high,
too low, too far up wind or down wind, in too close or out too far. Amen.
Jim O
----- Original Message -----
From: _Ron Van Putte_ (mailto:vanputte at cox.net)
To: _discussion at nsrca.org_ (mailto:discussion at nsrca.org)
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Another box rule (discussion)
On Mar 8, 2005, at 8:52 PM, Lance Van Nostrand wrote:
The concept of a rectangular box, instead of one that is a "vee", is
intriguing. It's hard to judge, but it would allow closer in flight without
detriment.
And we could say, "Gee, now we're flying just like IMAC." I think they call
it a "zoneless box", or something like that and they award "style points", or
something like that. Just what we need, no box and impression judging. Back
to the dark ages of judging! : (
Ron Van Putte
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050310/168bb2a4/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list