[SPAM] Re: New Sequences

[Troy A. Newman]

a top hat with options type of thing?

do it inline flat an inverted at the top
????


Troy
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: New Sequences


> How about if all "cross-box" type maneuvers were designed with "in-line" 
> options, then we meet correction and no-correction required needs. The 
> turnaround top-hat is a bit of an anomaly in that  it forces you in or 
> out. The humpty with options is much more versatile and pilot friendly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Pritchett" <phelps15 at comcast.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:03 PM
> Subject: New Sequences
>
>
>> Rodney:
>> Both proposed Advanced schedules are "easier" than the current Advanced 
>> schedule.  This was one of the criteria that we worked with, based upon 
>> overwhelming opinion that the jump to Advanced is currently too much.  I 
>> like both schedules (not because I'm on the committee...hehe), but what 
>> this WILL do is make the jump to Masters much bigger for the guys that 
>> will come through these schedules.  I am sort of a victim of having made 
>> the current jump, and now that I've made it, felt that I could 
>> objectively help others coming up in seasons to come not deal with some 
>> of the issues current Advanced flyers have had to handle.  Our current 
>> schedule calls for 10 maneuvers prior to a cross box turnaround. 
>> Although there is discussion on the list right now about being on that 
>> "line", and a cross box being a bother, let's face it, most Advanced 
>> flyers need to adjust in/out earlier than 10 maneuvers in.  Lots of 
>> thought and discussion went into these, and I'm sure that everyone on the 
>> committee hopes that the NSRCA membership takes a deep collective breath 
>> before making any judgments.  One thing we all tried to do is make it 
>> more even in jumps between classes, up to Masters.  We all seemed to 
>> agree that Masters should be the "big" jump, and a jump that provides a 
>> class of "Destination" for some, and FAI prep for others.  I hope that 
>> you, and others, will look at the proposed Advanced schedule as a part of 
>> the whole, and not a direct comparison to the present.
>> Thanks
>> Bill
>>
>>
>> Bill Pritchett
>> 765-744-9322
>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>> list.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.