New Sequences

Grow Pattern pattern4u at comcast.net
Thu Jun 9 19:32:36 AKDT 2005


How about if all "cross-box" type maneuvers were designed with "in-line" 
options, then we meet correction and no-correction required needs. The 
turnaround top-hat is a bit of an anomaly in that  it forces you in or out. 
The humpty with options is much more versatile and pilot friendly.

Regards,

Eric.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Pritchett" <phelps15 at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 8:03 PM
Subject: New Sequences


> Rodney:
> Both proposed Advanced schedules are "easier" than the current Advanced 
> schedule.  This was one of the criteria that we worked with, based upon 
> overwhelming opinion that the jump to Advanced is currently too much.  I 
> like both schedules (not because I'm on the committee...hehe), but what 
> this WILL do is make the jump to Masters much bigger for the guys that 
> will come through these schedules.  I am sort of a victim of having made 
> the current jump, and now that I've made it, felt that I could objectively 
> help others coming up in seasons to come not deal with some of the issues 
> current Advanced flyers have had to handle.  Our current schedule calls 
> for 10 maneuvers prior to a cross box turnaround.  Although there is 
> discussion on the list right now about being on that "line", and a cross 
> box being a bother, let's face it, most Advanced flyers need to adjust 
> in/out earlier than 10 maneuvers in.  Lots of thought and discussion went 
> into these, and I'm sure that everyone on the committee hopes that the 
> NSRCA membership takes a deep collective breath before making any 
> judgments.  One thing we all tried to do is make it more even in jumps 
> between classes, up to Masters.  We all seemed to agree that Masters 
> should be the "big" jump, and a jump that provides a class of 
> "Destination" for some, and FAI prep for others.  I hope that you, and 
> others, will look at the proposed Advanced schedule as a part of the 
> whole, and not a direct comparison to the present.
> Thanks
> Bill
>
>
> Bill Pritchett
> 765-744-9322
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list