Rule Change Proposal

Mike Hester kerlock at comcast.net
Thu Jun 9 17:54:37 AKDT 2005


I'd vote for it.

But you DO realize the model lawyers will have a field day with this one 
right? "The book only says 2 passes and if you have to make another to set 
up for landing in a different direction then isn't it a zero??"

It amazes me how the simplest things can be turned into such a complicated 
mess.

-Mike

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Van Putte" <vanputte at cox.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 9:29 PM
Subject: Rule Change Proposal


> I'd like to float a rule change proposal for consideration and discussion.
>
> After recently attending a contest in which landing downwind was very 
> difficult and dangerous, I thought there should be a rule change regarding 
> the landing direction.  Off the top of my head, I'd say something like, 
> "In case of a wind shift during the flight and to reduce the hazard to 
> people and the aircraft, subject to the approval of the judges, the 
> landing direction is the pilot's option."
>
> Comments?
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list