Flying the new sequences

[Grow Pattern]

Your right Verne,
                             I just looked at the last few Masters schedules 
and they don't have a roller after the TH.

I personally hate top-hats if there is not another cross-box, before or 
after, at the other end. Should be a design rule.......

(I will always believe that the 2005-7 schedule was voted in due a very 
unfortunate K-Factor misprint in one of the three schedule-offering in the 
survey.)

Eric.









----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Verne Koester" <verne at twmi.rr.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences


> Joe,
> That's my whole point. To do a nice job on either one of the rolls, you 
> pretty much need to go to the edge of the box. At that point, you HAVE to 
> go out or else you'll go out of the box. If you pull a little earlier so 
> you'll have room to come in and still stay in the box, the box gets pretty 
> narrow and you have to rush the roll that follows. I could be wrong, but I 
> don't think Masters has ever had a schedule before where a rolling 
> maneuver followed a forced, crossbox maneuver. Hopefully, we never will 
> again.
>
> Verne
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joe Lachowski" <jlachow at hotmail.com>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>
>
>> Verne, I refer to a good line as the proverbial no mans land <g>. Ah, 
>> !@#$ which way do I go!
>>
>>>From: "Verne Koester" <verne at twmi.rr.com>
>>>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>>Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>>>Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:29:56 -0400
>>>
>>>Mark,
>>>I'm talking about being the distance out you want to be and then having 
>>>to either move in closer or further out because of a crossbox maneuver on 
>>>the end. For me, that usually means that I'm flying the 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 
>>>roll and the reverse knife edge further out than I want to be because of 
>>>the crossbox maneuvers that precede both of them. In both cases, if you 
>>>were on a good line (distance out) to begin with, choosing to come in on 
>>>the crossbox turnaround shrinks the box too much and rushes the rolling 
>>>maneuver that follows. The only option then, is to go out (as little as 
>>>possible). In either case, the pilot's forced out of a good line, 
>>>assuming he's on one.
>>>
>>>Verne
>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>   From: Atwood, Mark
>>>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:14 PM
>>>   Subject: RE: Flying the new sequences
>>>
>>>
>>>   LOL.Verne.that seems rather oxymoronic.  I can't be too perfect a line 
>>> if you're not prepared for the upcoming maneuver! J
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   You're standards are just too high.  I'm not even close to a perfect 
>>> line and I don't notice it at all!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>   From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
>>> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Verne Koester
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:57 AM
>>>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>>   Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Eric,
>>>
>>>   For me, it depends on positioning. As a general rule of thumb, I don't 
>>> like doing a rolling maneuver after a forced cross-box maneuver because 
>>> it almost always forces you to go out (on the cross box) when you might 
>>> not otherwise. Actually, I wish we could come up with something new like 
>>> the humpty w/options that provides the option to adjust or not adjust 
>>> your line. As I fly the new Masters schedule, I find myself constantly 
>>> messing up a perfectly good line because of forced, crossbox maneuvers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Verne
>>
>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
>> list.
>>
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.