Flying the new sequences

[Verne Koester]

Joe,
That's my whole point. To do a nice job on either one of the rolls, you 
pretty much need to go to the edge of the box. At that point, you HAVE to go 
out or else you'll go out of the box. If you pull a little earlier so you'll 
have room to come in and still stay in the box, the box gets pretty narrow 
and you have to rush the roll that follows. I could be wrong, but I don't 
think Masters has ever had a schedule before where a rolling maneuver 
followed a forced, crossbox maneuver. Hopefully, we never will again.

Verne


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Lachowski" <jlachow at hotmail.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 9:37 PM
Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences


> Verne, I refer to a good line as the proverbial no mans land <g>. Ah, !@#$ 
> which way do I go!
>
>>From: "Verne Koester" <verne at twmi.rr.com>
>>Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>>Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>>Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:29:56 -0400
>>
>>Mark,
>>I'm talking about being the distance out you want to be and then having to 
>>either move in closer or further out because of a crossbox maneuver on the 
>>end. For me, that usually means that I'm flying the 1/4, 1/2, 1/4 roll and 
>>the reverse knife edge further out than I want to be because of the 
>>crossbox maneuvers that precede both of them. In both cases, if you were 
>>on a good line (distance out) to begin with, choosing to come in on the 
>>crossbox turnaround shrinks the box too much and rushes the rolling 
>>maneuver that follows. The only option then, is to go out (as little as 
>>possible). In either case, the pilot's forced out of a good line, assuming 
>>he's on one.
>>
>>Verne
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: Atwood, Mark
>>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>   Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:14 PM
>>   Subject: RE: Flying the new sequences
>>
>>
>>   LOL.Verne.that seems rather oxymoronic.  I can't be too perfect a line 
>> if you're not prepared for the upcoming maneuver! J
>>
>>
>>
>>   You're standards are just too high.  I'm not even close to a perfect 
>> line and I don't notice it at all!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>   From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
>> [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Verne Koester
>>   Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 11:57 AM
>>   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>>   Subject: Re: Flying the new sequences
>>
>>
>>
>>   Eric,
>>
>>   For me, it depends on positioning. As a general rule of thumb, I don't 
>> like doing a rolling maneuver after a forced cross-box maneuver because 
>> it almost always forces you to go out (on the cross box) when you might 
>> not otherwise. Actually, I wish we could come up with something new like 
>> the humpty w/options that provides the option to adjust or not adjust 
>> your line. As I fly the new Masters schedule, I find myself constantly 
>> messing up a perfectly good line because of forced, crossbox maneuvers.
>>
>>
>>
>>   Verne
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.