failed deliveries
George Kennie
geobet at gis.net
Tue Jul 26 05:28:23 AKDT 2005
Thanks Jim!!!!!!
Jim Ivey wrote:
> George e-mail are:
> flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net
> troy_newman at msn.com
>
> Jim Ivey
> >
> > From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> > Date: 2005/07/25 Mon PM 11:23:11 EDT
> > To: discussion at nsrca.org
> > Subject: failed deliveries
> >
> > Guys,
> > I e-mailed my order of finish to all who requested it but got the following undeliverable responses from the server:
> >
> > POSTMASTER at gis.net wrote:
> >
> > > When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at gis.net encountered
> > > permanent problems with the following addresses:
> > > For <flyinbill at bellsouth.net>, the destination server said: Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> > > For <troynewman at msn.com>, the destination server said: Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> > > For <tom.koenig at actewagl.au>, could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Reporting-MTA: dns; gis.net
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<flyinbill at bellsouth.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 5.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Vicenterc at comcast.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<troynewman at msn.com>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 5.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Patternrules at earthlink.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 1dX9im5zO3Nl3491 Message accepted for delivery (from earthlink.net:209.86.93.226)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<ronlock at comcast.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201130.CEHQ24218.imta07ps.mx.bigpond.com at gis.net (from bigpond.com:144.140.80.13)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<tom.koenig at actewagl.au>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 5.1.2
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 512X could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<jasonshulman at cox.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Don.ramsey at cox.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<davel322 at comcast.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<dflynt at verizon.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.5.0 Ok. (from verizon.net:206.46.232.11)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<rwantz2 at comcast.net>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<piloto37 at cfl.rr.com>
> > > Action: failed
> > > Status: 2.5.0
> > > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.0.0 j6PKBCdM029146 Message accepted for delivery (from cfl.rr.com:66.75.160.11)
> > > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Subject: unofficial numbers.
> > > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:26 -0400
> > > From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> > > Organization: None
> > > To: flyinbill at bellsouth.net, Vicenterc at comcast.net,
> > > troynewman at msn.com, Patternrules at earthlink.net,
> > > ronlock at comcast.net
> > > CC: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com, tom.koenig at actewagl.au,
> > > jasonshulman at cox.net, Don.ramsey at cox.net, davel322 at comcast.net
> > >
> > > I would like for everyone to be keenly aware that these results are
> > > the resultant observations of a lone, solitary, unofficial critic
> > > and represent only the OPINION of a singular individual and may not
> > > represent the judgements of any other observer and bear no impact on
> > > the actual results.
> > >
> > > Round Quique Don Troy
> > > Frak Dave Chip Andrew Todd
> > >
> > > 1 1000 968.5 963.5
> > > 950.25 946.9 946.9 910.4 897.2
> > >
> > > 2 1000 1000 962.8
> > > 937.4 945.9 939.1 937.4 942.5
> > >
> > > 3 1000 929.7 947.3
> > > 992.0 953.7 923.3 955.3 923.3
> > >
> > > 4 1000 940.6 0
> > > 894.7 921.9 881.2 937.2 932.1
> > >
> > > Totals 4000 3838.8 2873.6
> > > 3774.35 3768.4 3690.5 3740.3 3695.1
> > >
> > > These numbers yield an order of finish as follows
> > >
> > > 1 Quique
> > > 2 Don
> > > 3 Frak
> > > 4 Dave
> > > 5 Andrew
> > > 6 Todd
> > > 7 Chip
> > > 8 Troy
> > >
> > > As you can see, a case could probably be made regarding the
> > > influence of a diamond studded halo, real or imagined.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > =================================================
> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> > To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> > and follow the instructions.
> >
> > List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
> >
> >
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.
List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list