failed deliveries

Jim Ivey jivey61 at bellsouth.net
Tue Jul 26 04:41:45 AKDT 2005 

George e-mail are:
flyinbill1 at bellsouth.net
troy_newman at msn.com

 Jim Ivey
> 
> From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> Date: 2005/07/25 Mon PM 11:23:11 EDT
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: failed deliveries
> 
> Guys,
> I e-mailed my order of finish to all who requested it but got the following undeliverable responses from the server:
> 
> POSTMASTER at gis.net wrote:
> 
> > When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at gis.net encountered
> > permanent problems with the following addresses:
> > For <flyinbill at bellsouth.net>, the destination server said: Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> > For <troynewman at msn.com>, the destination server said: Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> > For <tom.koenig at actewagl.au>, could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
> >
> >   --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Reporting-MTA: dns; gis.net
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<flyinbill at bellsouth.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid recipient: <flyinbill at bellsouth.net> (from bellsouth.net:205.152.59.33)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Vicenterc at comcast.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<troynewman at msn.com>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (from msn.com:65.54.190.7)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Patternrules at earthlink.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 1dX9im5zO3Nl3491 Message accepted for delivery (from earthlink.net:209.86.93.226)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<ronlock at comcast.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<pentagon.systems at bigpond.com>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201130.CEHQ24218.imta07ps.mx.bigpond.com at gis.net (from bigpond.com:144.140.80.13)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<tom.koenig at actewagl.au>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 5.1.2
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 512X could not look up destination domain (actewagl.au), invalid domain name
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<jasonshulman at cox.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<Don.ramsey at cox.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 Message received: 20050725201115.QBVG17201.lakermgxi02.cox.net at gis.net (from cox.net:68.1.17.3)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<davel322 at comcast.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<dflynt at verizon.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.5.0 Ok. (from verizon.net:206.46.232.11)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<rwantz2 at comcast.net>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 ok ; id=20050725201115s20008stane (from comcast.net:63.240.76.26)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> > Final-Recipient: rfc822;<piloto37 at cfl.rr.com>
> > Action: failed
> > Status: 2.5.0
> > Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 250 2.0.0 j6PKBCdM029146 Message accepted for delivery (from cfl.rr.com:66.75.160.11)
> > Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:30 -0400
> >
> >   --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: unofficial numbers.
> > Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:11:26 -0400
> > From: George Kennie <geobet at gis.net>
> > Organization: None
> > To: flyinbill at bellsouth.net, Vicenterc at comcast.net,
> >      troynewman at msn.com, Patternrules at earthlink.net,
> >      ronlock at comcast.net
> > CC: pentagon.systems at bigpond.com, tom.koenig at actewagl.au,
> >      jasonshulman at cox.net, Don.ramsey at cox.net, davel322 at comcast.net
> >
> > I would like for everyone to be keenly aware that these results are
> > the resultant observations of a lone, solitary, unofficial critic
> > and represent only the OPINION of a singular individual and may not
> > represent the judgements of any other observer and bear no impact on
> > the actual results.
> >
> > Round             Quique          Don         Troy
> > Frak          Dave         Chip         Andrew          Todd
> >
> > 1                    1000             968.5       963.5
> > 950.25      946.9        946.9        910.4            897.2
> >
> > 2                     1000           1000         962.8
> > 937.4         945.9        939.1        937.4           942.5
> >
> > 3                     1000             929.7       947.3
> > 992.0         953.7        923.3        955.3           923.3
> >
> > 4                      1000            940.6          0
> > 894.7         921.9        881.2        937.2           932.1
> >
> > Totals              4000            3838.8      2873.6
> > 3774.35      3768.4       3690.5      3740.3        3695.1
> >
> > These numbers yield an order of finish as follows
> >
> > 1 Quique
> > 2 Don
> > 3 Frak
> > 4 Dave
> > 5 Andrew
> > 6 Todd
> > 7 Chip
> > 8 Troy
> >
> > As you can see, a case could probably be made regarding the
> > influence of a diamond studded halo, real or imagined.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.
> 
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.

More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list