* del klipped *: We're not starting that again, was: Re: adding complexity to Sportsman

[Del Rykert]

Guess what we need Bob is a survey asking those that don't fly pattern what they are willing to accept to try pattern at the Sportsman level. Granted they have to have desire or some interest first but if they come to fill the voluntary survey they must have some desire about aerobatics.
 
        del   
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Pastorello 
  To: discussion at nsrca.org 
  Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 11:12 AM
  Subject: Re: We're not starting that again, was: Re: adding complexity to Sportsman


  Differences of opinion is what makes this a "society".
  But it does NOT mean that topics are "dead" because folks disagree.  WE may not know how many lurkers don't want to engage in public discourse.  Or how many have gone underground to work changes that they desire.

  At least I'm out here, thumping the drum.
  And I will continue to do so.

  Bob Pastorello
  NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
  rcaerobob at cox.net
  www.rcaerobats.net


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Rcmaster199 at aol.com 
    To: discussion at nsrca.org 
    Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 10:07 AM
    Subject: We're not starting that again, was: Re: adding complexity to Sportsman


    I respectfully disagree. Complexity of Masters bears little resemblence to that in Sportsman. The two are mutually exclusive events and arguing the semantics or politics of that, is counterproductive. 

    Sportsman complexity is fine as is. So is Masters, as is. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050111/66cca2f6/attachment.html