Sequence Poll Results

[John Pavlick]

Bob,
 If only we could do the "election" stuff this way. Hmmm...  If everyone had
access to a computer, I guess we could.
John Pavlick
http://www.idseng.com


  -----Original Message-----
  From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On
Behalf Of Bob Pastorello
  Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 8:44 PM
  To: NSRCA
  Subject: Sequence Poll Results


  An "unofficial" poll of the NSRCA mail list members (and anyone else who
may read RCU's Pattern Forum) was approved by Tony Stillman, created and
posted by Ed Hartley on the NSRCA website.  Ed and I did the tabulations
independently and arrived at the information you see below.

  This information is the tabulation of all of your responses to this
question:
      "Should the progression of classes within AMA precision aerobatics be
designed to prepare a person for the FAI class?"


       YES
       NO
       TOTAL-Class
       % of Total
       % Y of Total
       % N of Total

        Sportsman
       9
       3
       12
       9%
       12%
       6%

        Intermediate
       21
       8
       29
       22%
       28%
       15%

        Advanced
       10
       14
       24
       19%
       13%
       26%

        Masters
       23
       20
       43
       33%
       30%
       38%

        FAI
       13
       8
       21
       16%
       17%
       15%

        TOTAL Polls
       76
       53
       129

       100%
       100%

        % of Total
       59%
       41%








  Five votes were disallowed, as they either did not contain a name,
competition class, or AMA number.  All three elements were required for a
vote to be tallied.  There were three votes where a person selected two
classes for their competition.  In those situations, I used the lower class,
so that the vote could be consistently counted across all classes
represented in those choices (there was one each in Intermediate, Advanced,
and Masters).
      The source information has been saved by Ed (and I) for archival
needs, should any arise.

  It is my hope, since I was the original "questioner", that this
information may serve to foster discussion and gain insights about our
preferences and serve also to springboard future similar polls and member
involvement activity in this Rule Change year.
      We wish the President-elect to consider this information, and discuss
with the Board possible future activities.

  Thanks to all of you for your participation and insight!!!

  Bob Pastorello
  NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
  rcaerobob at cox.net
  www.rcaerobats.net

  Ed Hartley
  roho2 at rcpattern.com



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 9/1/03
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050102/e0905364/attachment.html