Sequence Poll Results
Bob Pastorello
rcaerobob at cox.net
Sat Jan 1 16:44:42 AKST 2005
An "unofficial" poll of the NSRCA mail list members (and anyone else who may read RCU's Pattern Forum) was approved by Tony Stillman, created and posted by Ed Hartley on the NSRCA website. Ed and I did the tabulations independently and arrived at the information you see below.
This information is the tabulation of all of your responses to this question:
"Should the progression of classes within AMA precision aerobatics be designed to prepare a person for the FAI class?"
YES
NO
TOTAL-Class
% of Total
% Y of Total
% N of Total
Sportsman
9
3
12
9%
12%
6%
Intermediate
21
8
29
22%
28%
15%
Advanced
10
14
24
19%
13%
26%
Masters
23
20
43
33%
30%
38%
FAI
13
8
21
16%
17%
15%
TOTAL Polls
76
53
129
100%
100%
% of Total
59%
41%
Five votes were disallowed, as they either did not contain a name, competition class, or AMA number. All three elements were required for a vote to be tallied. There were three votes where a person selected two classes for their competition. In those situations, I used the lower class, so that the vote could be consistently counted across all classes represented in those choices (there was one each in Intermediate, Advanced, and Masters).
The source information has been saved by Ed (and I) for archival needs, should any arise.
It is my hope, since I was the original "questioner", that this information may serve to foster discussion and gain insights about our preferences and serve also to springboard future similar polls and member involvement activity in this Rule Change year.
We wish the President-elect to consider this information, and discuss with the Board possible future activities.
Thanks to all of you for your participation and insight!!!
Bob Pastorello
NSRCA 199 AMA 46373
rcaerobob at cox.net
www.rcaerobats.net
Ed Hartley
roho2 at rcpattern.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050102/3a761338/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list