Sequence Poll Results

[Ron Lockhart]

For the 41%  voting to Not have the progression of AMA classes be designed to prepare for F3A, 
what changes would you like to see in those classes?

Feel free to respond on or off list.

Later, Ron Lockhart
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bob Pastorello 
  To: NSRCA 
  Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2005 8:44 PM
  Subject: Sequence Poll Results


  An "unofficial" poll of the NSRCA mail list members (and anyone else who may read RCU's Pattern Forum) was approved by Tony Stillman, created and posted by Ed Hartley on the NSRCA website.  Ed and I did the tabulations independently and arrived at the information you see below.

  This information is the tabulation of all of your responses to this question:
      "Should the progression of classes within AMA precision aerobatics be designed to prepare a person for the FAI class?"


       YES
       NO
       TOTAL-Class
       % of Total
       % Y of Total
       % N of Total
       
        Sportsman
       9
       3
       12
       9%
       12%
       6%
       
        Intermediate
       21
       8
       29
       22%
       28%
       15%
       
        Advanced
       10
       14
       24
       19%
       13%
       26%
       
        Masters
       23
       20
       43
       33%
       30%
       38%
       
        FAI
       13
       8
       21
       16%
       17%
       15%
       
        TOTAL Polls
       76
       53
       129
       
       100%
       100%
       
        % of Total
       59%
       41%
       
       
       
       
       


   
  Five votes were disallowed, as they either did not contain a name, competition class, or AMA number.  All three elements were required for a vote to be tallied.  There were three votes where a person selected two classes for their competition.  In those situations, I used the lower class, so that the vote could be consistently counted across all classes represented in those choices (there was one each in Intermediate, Advanced, and Masters).
      The source information has been saved by Ed (and I) for archival needs, should any arise.

  It is my hope, since I was the original "questioner", that this information may serve to foster discussion and gain insights about our preferences and serve also to springboard future similar polls and member involvement activity in this Rule Change year.
      We wish the President-elect to consider this information, and discuss with the Board possible future activities.

  Thanks to all of you for your participation and insight!!!

  Bob Pastorello
  NSRCA 199  AMA 46373
  rcaerobob at cox.net
  www.rcaerobats.net

  Ed Hartley
  roho2 at rcpattern.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050102/d7f0f0e1/attachment-0001.html