Weight limit discussion

[Atwood, Mark]

Hey Buddy,

 

I think this has potential.  We need to sort through the specifics...but
I think it could be framed in a way to accomplish the intended goal
without the unintended consequences that the previously beaten to death
discussion on weight change would bring.

 

-Mark

 

________________________________

From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]
On Behalf Of BUDDYonRC at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 5:15 PM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Weight limit discussion

 

Dave-Mark-Bob-John etc.etc.etc.

As I said in my previous post I fully understand the reasoning from both
sides of this issue and requested pro and con opinions on a possible
solution which will satisfy the area that I think is driving this
discussion. That is the absolute necessity to spend large amounts of
money to reduce the weight of a model to bring it into compliance with
the weight limit.

Especially for those who cannot afford it and would like to participate
in the Nat's 

I have received suggestions that this issue could be resolved by
adopting a penalty system similar to that now in place for the Noise
Limit rule and another suggestion that would provide for a 2/12% over
weight allowance. If you have an opinion I would like to hear it.

Buddy    

  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050228/8da7c3d5/attachment.html