Composite-ARF Impact question

Dean Pappas d.pappas at kodeos.com
Wed Feb 2 05:31:24 AKST 2005


Harrumph!

Dean Pappas
Sr. Design Engineer
Kodeos Communications
111 Corporate Blvd.
South Plainfield, N.J. 07080
(908) 222-7817 phone
(908) 222-2392 fax
d.pappas at kodeos.com


-----Original Message-----
From: discussion-request at nsrca.org
[mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Ed Miller
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:51 AM
To: discussion at nsrca.org
Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question


The American kit manufacturers haven't learned the secret. The more one pays 
for an item, the harder one will defend it and overlook it's deficiencies. 
We had an abundance of American cottage industry kits manufacturers AND 
designers, we drove them out of business with the plane of the week 
mentality.
Ed M.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Hunt" <flyintexan at houston.rr.com>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question


> I'm gonna say it.....just can't hold back.....if an Aires fuse was like 
> this we'd be hearing all about how hard it is to find a quality pattern 
> kit in the US.  Drives me nuts that so many people have been fixing this 
> without so much as one bad word about this company.....
>
>
> there...I feel better.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Keith Black" <tkeithb at comcast.net>
> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 11:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
>
>
>> OK guys, all this talk has gotten me to take another look at my new 
>> Impact.
>> Here's what I see.
>>
>> 1) I cannot detect any twist in the fin. Perhaps someone can tell me how 
>> to
>> look for this, but I can't see it.
>>
>> 2) If I measure for straightness in the fuse it is not perfectly 
>> straight.
>> It's hard to tell if the left side is just a little fuller (puffy) or if 
>> it
>> is bent. Whatever the case, it's not perfectly symmetrical. I did notice
>> when mounting the gear that the *inside* of one half was slightly flatter
>> than the other side.  Specifics of my measurements: I lined up the fuse 
>> on
>> graph paper and measured for straightness by setting the nose on the 
>> center
>> line and the tail on the center line. I then took measurements 
>> periodically
>> along fuse checking the distance from the center line (using a square). 
>> At
>> the most extreme point the left side is wider by about 1/4". To double 
>> check
>> I then centered the mid-point of the fuse and the nose. This resulted in 
>> the
>> rudder being about 1/4" off to the right.
>>
>> I know it's preferable to have a perfectly straight fuse, but considering
>> the overall size of the fuse, how well I've seen other Impacts fly, (and 
>> the
>> fact that I already own it), I'm not going to worry about. With all the
>> right thrust discussions held lately I'm sure I can get it trimmed to fly
>> fine. Also, given it's a molded fuse I'm sure that Jason's was the same 
>> and
>> he did pretty well with his ;-)
>>
>> BTW, I did the same measurements on both of my Aries fuses prior to 
>> building
>> and they were extremely straight. Knowing all the work Lance and Gray put
>> into the Symphony I'm sure it's dead on as well.
>>
>> Keith Black
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Bill Southwell" <bnbsouthwell at bellsouth.net>
>> To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 8:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: Composite-ARF Impact question
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    Hi Adam,
>>>
>>>    Hey at least no mention of concubines or other strange behavior. If
>>> all of you are having a vision problem ( mass hallucination) there will
>>> be a  group therapy session at the NATS. I hope this will help all
>>> CompARF customers to get with the program...err ah how not to see
>>> things.  It is funny its no manufacturing error but everyone has had the
>>> same issue. I bet the fellow who crates the fuselages gets a broom
>>> tomorrow to work with. You have to be in awe of his consistency in
>>> applying pressure to each fuse. Thank goodness he studied the
>>> aerodynamics of the thing...he must be a genius as all 350 fly dead
>>> straight now!
>>>
>>>    If a manufacture in the states created a ahhh a well...... "visual
>>> effect"  like that people would be slamming the same for lack of quality
>>> and ripping the customer off.  I have talked to several friends who have
>>> the gassser CompARF planes and they have reported quality issues  and
>>> felt that for the money it could have been better. guess its a case of "
>>> international tolerance and good will" at work here ( Geez now I am
>>> sounding like Mike Savage). I say don't be intimidated and demand a
>>> refund for the banana. He gives you all your ammunition in his
>>> reply...well at the bottom any how.  I still think if he added something
>>> with concubines and court it would be more interesting to
>>> read...................................................Just basking in
>>> the flames here :>)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Bill   " medium to well done" Southwell
>>> Iuka, MS
>>>
>>> Adam Quennoz wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm glad to see others are seeing the same thing.  I thought I was
>>> > nuts.  I e-mailed Composite-ARF about this issue.  Here's the reply:
>>> >
>>> > Hello Adam,
>>> >
>>> > since 350 Impacts come from the same molds, and all fly perfectly
>>> > straight,
>>> > there is no manufacturing error in yours.
>>> >
>>> > The center line (seam line) is a little bit out of center, this might
>>> > make
>>> > it appear not straight, possibly.
>>> >
>>> > If the fuselage got pressure during shipping / storing, so that the
>>> > fin was
>>> > slightly twisted in the box, this can be easily fixed when gluing in 
>>> > the
>>> > rear hinge post. But actually, I do not think that you would have to
>> make
>>> > any corrections, as I know that the fin appears to be a little bit
>>> > off, but
>>> > it doesn't. the planes fly dead straight.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > =================================================
>>> > To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> > http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> > To be removed from this list, go to 
>>> > http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> > and follow the instructions.
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> =================================================
>>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>>> and follow the instructions.
>>>
>>
>> =================================================
>> To access the email archives for this list, go to
>> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
>> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
>> and follow the instructions.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.




More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list