[NSRCA-discussion] F3a Shocky C.G.

Alan Hewson hewson5 at on.aibn.com
Wed Dec 21 19:35:33 AKST 2005


Similar plane......1.5" behind recommended C.G.
If you go too far you just have a rough landing :-)
Alan Hewson




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Pavlick" <jpavlick at idseng.com>
To: "NSRCA Discussion" <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:32 PM
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] F3a Shocky C.G.


> Kind of not pattern related but I'm sure someone can answer this: What is
> the most rearward C.G. that anyone has flown the F3a Shock-Flyer with? I'm
> getting mine ready for its first flight now and unless I put the batteries
> all the way up front (as in right behind the motor) I end up tail heavy at
> best. At least according to the instructions. I'm using an AXI 2204/54 
> right
> on the nose and T.P. 3C/480's. The recommended C.G. looks rather nose 
> heavy
> so I'm thinking maybe 1" back from what they recommend might be OK?
>
> John Pavlick
> http://www.idseng.com
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.3/209 - Release Date: 12/21/05
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list