[SPAM] Re: Re: Judges Caller

Grow Pattern pattern4u at comcast.net
Thu Aug 4 14:39:20 AKDT 2005


The judges should be far enough back for you not to hear them.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Ivey" <jivey61 at bellsouth.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Re: Judges Caller


> OK, My time.
> I think if someone else other than my caller was calling the manouvers at 
> a different time than when I want the manouver,it would mess me up 
> bigtime. It is hard to keep your mind on the flight with people talking in 
> the background.
> Now having said that ,I could instruct my caller to say the manouvers loud 
> enough that the judges could hear. To me that would be less distracting. 
> Matter of fact we generally ask that to be done in local contests. It 
> works pretty good and another person is not needed.
>
> Jim Ivey
>>
>> From: ronlock at comcast.net
>> Date: 2005/08/04 Thu PM 04:13:14 EDT
>> To: discussion at nsrca.org,  discussion at nsrca.org
>> CC: "Rick Wallace" <rickwallace45 at hotmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: Judges Caller
>>
>> Agree with the Judges caller.  It will help, and is relatively easy to 
>> accomplish.
>>
>> Ron Lockhart
>>
>> -------------- Original message -------------- 
>>
>> Don Ramsey was kind enough to provide a judges' caller for the FAI 
>> Finals, and it was a great help... not to mention a source of occasional 
>> harmless smiles.
>> I believe that the Pilot's caller is exactly that -- an assistant to the 
>> pilot. What goes on between them the pilot and caller shouldn't go any 
>> further than that. If the judges need a caller ( and that IS often a 
>> great help) that caller should be a separate person.
>>
>>
>> >From: "Grow Pattern" <pattern4u at comcast.net>
>> >Reply-To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
>> >Subject: Re: Performance Judging?  Trial Balloon
>> >Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 09:08:25 -0400
>> >
>> >A judges caller would work.
>> >
>> >
>> >Eric.
>> >   ----- Original Message -----
>> >   From: Chuck Hochhalter
>> >   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >   Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:43 AM
>> >   Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>> >
>> >
>> >   I think this would hurt my scores.  Many times I have heard my caller 
>> > go oh// *(&*(&  wrong rudder or you almost flopped that or maybe they 
>> > were looking down and didn't see that..  I don't care for the judges to 
>> > hear my caller/coach/critic mumble things like your figure 8 appeared 
>> > to be a snowman etc or help in calling center.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >   CHUCK
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >   -----Original Message-----
>> >   From: discussion-request at nsrca.org 
>> > [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jay Marshall
>> >   Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 7:23 AM
>> >   To: discussion at nsrca.org
>> >   Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >   It would be interesting to use a small wireless headset/mike on the 
>> > caller so the judges, with a receive headset, could know absolutely 
>> > what the next maneuver was supposed to be.
>>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
> 

=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.



More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list