Performance Judging? Trial Balloon

[Earl Haury]

Thanks Gene - good info.

Earl

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gene Maurice" <gene.maurice at comcast.net>
To: <discussion at nsrca.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:36 AM
Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon


> Earl, Buddy,
>
> Here it is..............
>
> Intermediate - 14 Contestants x 15 In-Flight Maneuvers = 210 Scoring
> Opportunities
> Round                   1      2      3      4      5      6      Avg
> No of  2pt "Spreads"    26     31     21     29     17     41     27.50
> % of 210                12.38% 14.76% 10.00% 13.81% 8.10%  19.52% 13.10%
>
> No of  3pt "Spreads"    4      11     6      6      1      9      6.17
> % of 210                1.90%  5.24%  2.86%  2.86%  0.48%  4.29%  2.94%
>
> Advanced - 22 Contestants x 17 In-Flight Maneuvers = 374 Scoring
> Opportunities
> Round                   1      2      3      4      5      6      Avg
> No of  2pt "Spreads"    102    69     163    82     77     49     90.33
> % of 374                27.27% 18.45% 43.58% 21.93% 20.59% 13.10% 24.15%
>
> No of  3pt "Spreads"    23     19     67     18     11     9      24.50
> % of 374                6.15%  5.08%  17.91% 4.81%  2.94%  2.41%  6.55%
>
> Masters Preliminaries - 38 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 798
> Scoring Opportunities
> Round                   1      2      3      4      5      6      Avg
> No of  2pt "Spreads"    130    108    208    107    210    200    160.50
> % of 798                16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41% 26.32% 25.06% 20.11%
>
> No of  3pt "Spreads"    34     28     59     24     49     39     38.83
> % of 798                4.26%  3.51%  7.39%  3.01%  6.14%  4.89%  4.87%
>
> FAI Preliminaries - 29 Contestants x 21 In-Flight Maneuvers = 609 Scoring
> Opportunities
> Round                   1      2      3      4      5      6      Avg
> No of  2pt "Spreads"    129    155    119    229    114    176    153.67
> % of 609                21.18% 25.45% 19.54% 37.60% 18.72% 28.90% 25.23%
>
> No of  3pt "Spreads"    18     38     16     59     21     38     31.67
> % of 609                2.96%  6.24%  2.63%  9.69%  3.45%  6.24%  5.20%
>
>
>
> Gene Maurice
> gene.maurice at comcast.net
> Plano, TX
> AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] 
> On
> Behalf Of Earl Haury
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 9:31 AM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>
> Gene
>
> Good info, and pretty reasonable spreads. It would be interesting to see
> like data from the other classes. One might expect Masters to have the
> lowest spread, as they are being judged by the most experienced fliers 
> (not
> necessarily judges).
>
> Earl
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Gene Maurice
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 6:51 AM
> Subject: RE: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>
>
> Don,
>
> Here's some stats to mull over........
>
> I've pulled all of the scores into a spreadsheet and identified every
> instance where the difference between any of the 3 judges raw scores was
> plus or minus more than 2 points, then plus or minus more than 3 points
>
> Masters Prelims had 38 pilots actually flying x 21 scored maneuvers
> (excluded TO and Land.) = 798  "judging opportunities" in each of 6 
> rounds.
>
> Round                                       1          2          3
> 4          5          6
> No of  2pt "Spreads"                   130       108       208       107
> 210       200
> % of 798                                   16.29% 13.53% 26.07% 13.41%
> 26.32% 25.06%
>
> No of  3pt "Spreads"                   34         28         59         24
> 49         39
> % of 798                                   4.26%   3.51%   7.39%   3.01%
> 6.14%   4.89%
>
> Gene Maurice
> gene.maurice at comcast.net
> Plano, TX
> AMA 3408, NSRCA 877
>
>
>
> From: discussion-request at nsrca.org [mailto:discussion-request at nsrca.org] 
> On
> Behalf Of Don Ramsey
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 5:02 PM
> To: discussion at nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: Performance Judging? Trial Balloon
>
> We have heard from a lot of Advanced pilots about the judging on that 
> line.
> I would like some feed back from Masters and FAI on the prelims judges. 
> My
> very limited survey seems to indicated that those lines had very good
> judging.  I had a lot of 5s & 6s and some good scores but overall my 
> scores,
>
> in my opinion, were spot on.  I'm only asking about the prelims.
>
> Don
>
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> =================================================
> To access the email archives for this list, go to
> http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
> To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
> and follow the instructions.
>
> List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the 
> list.
>
> 


=================================================
To access the email archives for this list, go to
http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/
To be removed from this list, go to http://www.nsrca.org/discussionA.htm
and follow the instructions.

List members email returned for mailbox full will be removed from the list.