Scoring formula/ and observations
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
BUDDYonRC at aol.com
Mon Aug 1 05:52:37 AKDT 2005
In a message dated 7/31/2005 10:04:05 PM Central Daylight Time,
patternrules at earthlink.net writes:
Buddy the biggest reason that they do finals in masters and FAI, is that
they don't fly in front of the same judges unlike the Intermediate and advanced
then you have the problem of finding more judges also according to the number
of pilots you use in both classes, if you use 8 pilots and single flight
lines and 3 rounds it wouldn't be over and all others would, if they use 2
flight lines then more judges just don't seem practical to me.
No I don't fly advanced anymore for many reasons #1 because I feel like I
have a short time to get as good as I can be at age 56, the last 3 years I have
practiced the FAI pattern in the fall and feel I have learned much more than
staying flying advanced, so now I only flying FAI not good at it but I learn
something every time I fly, #2 I like the pattern changing every 2 years #3
not everyone and there brother have a say in what FAI do (less problems and
headaches) #4 I never could get score down at the site 4 and from what I
could see I was one of a few that was tring to emulate the FAI and Masters
pilots, I proved this last year last day, by just doing fast rolls no finess at all
just fast and stop my scores went up by 100 raw points I was told all years
on site 4 that I was the only one that really ever showed good throttle
management but still no scores #5 if I'm going to be last I'd rather be last in
FAI than last in advanced.
Steven Maxwell
_patternrules at earthlink.net_ (mailto:patternrules at earthlink.net)
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
Steven
There are plenty of judges available to do what I suggest, even to the point
of flying everyone in front of the same judges. The fact is that if you do
this many will be required to judge two and some all three days. If people go
to the Nat's to pick the best then they should be willing to do what is
necessary to accomplish that. If they use the Nat's as a vacation and are not
willing to do what is necessary to help assure that, then we will never know who
is actually the best we will only know who in a mathematical probability
most likely is the best, and given the fact that the best judges are not used
every day on every flight line the mathematical probability is most likely not
correct so why do we continue to settle for the possibility of allowing the
worst of the best determine the winners.
If that is what we want, then I will get off of my soap box and shut my
mouth.
Buddy
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.f3a.us/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20050801/89efaa9b/attachment.html
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list